Introduction
So
one of the things that I’ve realized is that’s it is very hard for people to
find their way to God or back to God. And if they do, maintaining a
relationship with Him can also be difficult even though I don’t believe it was
intended to be. Having said that, it is one thing for people to willingly
choose not to be in relationship God, it is quite another when the church,
religious leaders or theological systems create unnecessary or insurmountable
obstacles. The former makes me sad but the latter drives me absolutely crazy.
Sometimes certain segments of the Church does things that makes me wonder if
they have actually ever read the Bible. If we don’t pay attention to God’s Word
then we’re in grave danger of making the same mistake over and over to our own
peril! (See previous post; Title—Ignoring
The Lessons Of History; Label—Theology; Date—8/22/12). Last week I picked
up a story about the Catholic church in Germany that caught my attention.
Here’s how the headline reads: German
Court Backs Catholic ‘Pay To Pray’ Rule.[1]
Come on! Tell me that doesn’t pique your curiosity? I had to read it a few
times to try to understand it; not because it’s complicated but because it’s so
ridiculous. I won’t try and regurgitate it all for you in detail, but I’ll give
you an overview of what it said. Evidently, in order to be officially
recognized as a member of the Catholic church in Germany, believers must pay a
“religious tax.” The Catholic church in Germany receives more than $5 billion
every year from an income tax surcharge on registered Catholics. A retired
theologian went to court wanting to opt out of paying the tax by leaving the
Catholic church as an institution but wanting to remain part of the Catholic
community. No big deal right? Wrong! Germany’s bishops proclaimed that
believers who refuse to pay the tax are deemed to have committed a “grave
lapse” and are no longer eligible to receive the sacraments or become
godparents or have a religious funeral. In other words, if you don’t pay you
can’t have access to God. Really? You have got to be kidding me! When Jesus
died on the cross and the temple curtain was torn in two, it signified that we
had direct access to God (Mt. 27:51). Why is that important? Because up to that
point, the religious leaders who were suppose to facilitate the relationship
between God and people actually constructed a complex religious obstacle course
that they alone could maneuver according to their rules. This is precisely what
so consistently angered Jesus. Most of the time, we get an image of Jesus as
calm and compassionate but try to create an obstacle between God and people and
you’ll see a side of Jesus that should make you think twice about crossing him.
The church is supposed to be a place of prayer and a place where people can go
to facilitate their relationship with God yet there are some that are intent on
Turning the Church into a Den of Robbers!
Identifying
a problem is one thing, but how do we solve the problem? Well if the Church
would take the time to truly study God’s Word then perhaps they wouldn’t get
themselves into this kind of trouble. However, God’s Word doesn’t just instruct
us on how to avoid these issues, we can study God’s Word to see how the
problems are solved. Let’s look how Jesus solved a very similar issue in his
day.
Matthew 21:12-17
12 Jesus entered the temple courts and drove
out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the
money changers and the benches of those selling doves. 13 “It is written,” he said to them, “‘My house
will be called a house of prayer,’ but you are making it ‘a den of robbers.’” 14 The blind and the lame came to him at the
temple, and he healed them. 15 But
when the chief priests and the teachers of the law saw the wonderful things he
did and the children shouting in the temple courts, “Hosanna to the Son of
David,” they were indignant. 16 “Do
you hear what these children are saying?” they asked him. “Yes,” replied Jesus,
“have you never read, “‘From the lips of children and infants you, Lord, have
called forth your praise’?” 17 And
he left them and went out of the city to Bethany, where he spent the night.
Context
The
scene leading up to these particular verses is truly amazing. Jesus wasn’t
generally given to announcing his true identity but v. 5 is one of those few
occasions when he makes clear that he is the much anticipated king. Jesus
fulfills the prophecy of the Old Testament prophet Zechariah when he rides into
Jerusalem on a donkey (Zech 9:9). The crowds have heard his teachings and witnessed
his many miracles and now he’s fulfilling a long-awaited prophecy of the coming
Messiah. You see, while we might
forget the promises God makes to us, God’s promises were woven into the fabric
of Jewish life. So when they saw Jesus coming, they did what came natural to
them; they worshipped him! They gave him praise as they shouted “Hosanna!” The
word is a Hebrew expression of praise that means something like “Save, we pray.”
They worshipped him as the one who came in God’s name with the highest praise.
They laid out coats and palm branches along the path as Jesus rode into Jerusalem.
Today we recognize that day as Palm Sunday. But once Jesus reaches the temple,
the fireworks begin!
Text
Analysis
Jesus
wastes no time cleaning house in v. 12-13 when he reaches the temple. The
ability to do a Powerpoint® presentation here would be nice so I could show you pictures
of the temple area during this lesson but I’ve included a link at the right
illustrating the temple area during Jesus’ time so maybe you can put a picture
to my words.[2] In any
event, it’s not really known through which gate Jesus entered but some believe
he entered through the Golden Gate. I don’t want to make too much of this but
it’s interesting to note that the prophecy in Ezekiel 43:1-6 foretells of a day
when the glory of God will enter the temple through the east gate which would
later be called the “Golden Gate.” It’s a bit of a digression in our study but
I thought it was an interesting bit of information since the crowd was just
praising him as the awaited Messiah.
Whichever
gate Jesus entered, he eventually made his way to the Court of the Gentiles
where tables were set up to sell sacrificial animals and to exchange foreign
currency. People came from great distances to worship God. Not all were allowed
into the inner-most part of the temple but all were permitted into the temple
area to bring sacrifices and worship God. Clearly, the religious leaders saw no
problem with what was going on as it facilitated the religious “machinery” of
the day. People traveled from far and wide to celebrate the Passover in Jerusalem.
This resulted in two particular realities: 1) People did not generally travel
with the animals they needed to offer as sacrifice so they needed to be able to
buy animals to sacrifice when they got to Jerusalem; and 2) Currency varied
from town to town and since there was a prescribed temple tax that was due from
each person, foreign currency exchange was required so the proper shekel could
be offered and the daily operation of the temple could be maintained within the
local economy. There was one additional reality that is important to remember
as well; many could not afford the customary sheep sacrifice and therefore
needed to substitute doves in their place (Lev 5:7) which were also available
to purchase. Having clarified these realities, this was not what made Jesus so
angry. Try, if you can, to picture the scene of thousands of people and animals
together with the smells and sounds that would accompany it all; take a minute
to try and visualize that. Now, take that image and place it right in the middle
of your own church. I’m not talking about the parking lot or that big open
field next to your building; I’m talking about putting it right in your church
building; not in the lobby or storage area or back classroom; but right where
people gather to worship and pray! That’s exactly what was going on here. The
Court of the Gentiles wasn’t some kind of annexed out-building, it was part of
the temple built according to God’s specific instructions. It was not less holy
than anywhere else in the temple with the exception of the Holy of Holies which
is where God’s glory was to reside. The Court of the Gentiles, as the name
implies, was the place in the temple designated for Gentiles to pray and
worship. There are so many things wrong with what is going on that it could
have been any one of them that set Jesus off but all three together culminated
in Jesus’ condemnation that what God intended as a house of prayer, the
religious leaders were turning into a den of robbers. The key words in Jesus’
statement create a sharp contrast to consider; “house of prayer” vs “den of
robbers.”
First,
it is a common misconception that Israel’s worship and sacrificial system was instituted
for the exclusive observance and benefit of the Jewish people. This is clearly
inaccurate as is evidenced by the fact that the temple included an area
specifically for non-Jewish people to participate in the form of prayer,
worship and offering sacrifices. Furthermore, it was one of God’s primary
purposes that Israel be a shining example to the nations that surrounded them
so that those nations would also come to know and worship God. God provided the
way but the religious leaders, instead, stood in the way by occupying the space
set aside for Gentiles to perpetuate what they thought was more important. As a
result, the people God was trying to reach through Israel were being displaced
by Israel.
Second,
there’s nothing inherently wrong with selling animals to sacrifice, whether
sheep or doves. However, numerous Jewish historical writings record that these animal
merchants took advantage of their buyers by charging exorbitant prices. This
was especially difficult on those who were poor and who had little money to
spare as it was. However, without the appropriate sacrifices, they could not
fully participate as the Law prescribed. This left pilgrims at the mercy of
unscrupulous merchants.
Third,
since the many regions from which pilgrims traveled used currency specific to
their particular provinces, it is not unreasonable to expect that there would
be a place to exchange foreign currency so that these travelers could offer the
appropriate temple tax. However, as with the animal merchants, currency
exchange agents were believed to have added significant profit margins to the
exchange rates. Again, this made it particularly difficult for the poor to
fully participate as the Law prescribed without much choice but to accept the
inflated exchange rate.
Combine
these three and the religious leaders created and perpetuated an environment
and practice that was in stark contradiction to the heart of God; they were
making it difficult to get to God, to worship God and to be in relationship
with God; a very bad combination. As a result, Jesus picked up a whip, turned
over the tables of the merchants and money changers and drove them all out with
the admonition that the temple was God’s house and was intended to be a place
of prayer for all people and they turned it into a place where those who were
seeking God had to first pay a premium to “robbers” do so; all under the
watchful, and perhaps approving, eyes of the religious leaders. “Once again it
is the ‘clergy’ and the ‘Bible teachers,’ not the disreputable people of
society, who are Jesus’ target for attack. Corruption among the leadership of
God’s people arouses Jesus’ wrath more quickly than anything else. But Christ
does more than denounce justice—he takes action against it.”[3]
V. 14
Paints a picture of activities that are far more consistent with the heart of
God as those who were broken and hurting were brought to Jesus who healed them
and cared for them. “The ‘blind and lame,’ whose access to the temple was
severely restricted, probably to the Court of the Gentiles (cf. Lev 21:18-19; 2
Sam 5:8) having apparently heard of Jesus’ presence in the temple, seek him out
and, ‘he healed them.’ The Messiah thus manifests the blessings of the kingdom
precisely in the precincts of the temple, which is thereby transformed from a
commercial center to a place of healing.”[4] Add
to that children shouting praises at him while in the temple and you have a
beautiful picture of a house of prayer where people are free to come and be
healed while others are free to worship. Simply put; people are free to be in
relationship with the Messiah; free to be in relationship with God; clean,
unclean, rich, poor, healthy, sick, old and young. All are welcome to reach out
to God without cost, it only requires faith; faith that Jesus is the One sent
by God; the Messiah.
In v.
15-16a, the religious leaders, who are obviously aware of everything that has
happened to this point, become indignant with the chorus of praises from the
children directed at Jesus. We shouldn’t be surprised by this should we? The
religious leaders were losing their grip on everything; the commercial
enterprises within the temple were gone, Jesus exercised supreme authority through
his seminal teachings, Jesus performed miracles whenever and wherever he chose,
and the people began looking to Jesus for guidance and direction. Now he was
accepting praise from children right in the temple. However, “even if the
priestly aristocracy was gentler than their opponents’ portraits of them
suggest, Roman rule left them no choice but to correct him or betray him to the
governor.”[5]
Jesus responds to their question in v. 16b by quoting from Ps 8:2. This had to
infuriate them all the more since the Psalm emphasizes that the praise of God’s
glory by children would silence all his adversaries. So “If children praise
him, how much more ought the religious leaders to join in.”[6]
On
the surface, v. 17 seems fairly benign but think about it for just a moment and
picture the scene in the context of your own church. Jesus has come and made
access to God as simple as just coming to him; no more “pay to pray;” the sick
are being healed and the broken are being made whole and all the while, children
are skipping through the church singing the praises you’ve taught them or those
they’ve learned in Sunday school or learned singing right next to you during
the church service. Can you imagine a more beautiful image of church? No matter
how spectacular your church service might be, having Jesus there in person must
be infinitely greater (even considering Jesus’ own words that he would be
present where two or more are gathered in his name). Suddenly, however, the
pastors and elders of the church come forward and convince Jesus to leave
because Jesus, “won’t do things the way they’ve always been done or the way
they think it should be done; after all, they’re in charge aren’t they?”
Application
These
verses have been used to teach about what can or can’t be done within a church.
For example, can a church have fundraising events, like bake sales or bingo
nights? Can the church make a profit of any kind? For example, can the church
invest its tithes to earn extra money? Some even use these verses to teach
about appropriate behavior for children in a church setting. I suppose you
could drag that teaching out of these verses if you worked really hard at it
but then I believe you’d be missing the obvious message. God will not tolerate
any obstacles that make it more difficult for people, all people, to be able to
reach out to Him for help, to worship Him, or to be in relationship with Him.
If this lesson is anything then it is a warning that we had best be careful not
to get between God and those he is trying to reach with his love and salvation.
Additionally,
these verses answer some important “what ifs;” what if we don’t have the right
offering? What if we have nothing to offer but ourselves? What if we’re lost?
What if we’re broken? What if all we want to do is sing? What if all we want to
do is be in the presence of God? These verses make it very clear that all these
things are available to us and all we have to do is just go to Him in faith.
This is extremely important in light of the illustration of the Catholic church
in Germany that I referenced at the beginning. I am very familiar with the
Catholic church since I grew up Catholic. What is going on in the Catholic
church in Germany is one of the reasons why I prepared the lesson titled Know Why You Believe What You Believe
(See previous post—Title: Know Why You
Believe What You Believe; Label: Theology; Date: 3/21/12 & 3/28/12).
When we don’t know why we believe what we believe then we allow ourselves to be
held captive by the unbiblical teachings of religious leaders who, in the case
of the Catholic church in Germany, are seeking to maintain the financial
contribution they receive from the state by threatening believers with the loss
of their salvation (I can almost hear Jesus cracking his whip)! As I said in
that particular lesson series, my objective is not that you should believe what
I believe but that you must understand why you believe what you believe in
light of what the Scriptures teach and not what some religious leader might be
telling you. When religious leaders use their authority or their exegetical
proficiency of the Scriptures for their own advancement either politically,
socially or financially then they are participating in Turning the Church into a Den of Robbers and they must be confronted
and corrected. Thereafter, if they persist in their deception and “thievery” then
they must be rejected.
[1] “German
court backs Catholic ‘pay to pray’ rule,” http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hcLbZLtsj-2iRq8z1QkRTdZHkjSg?docId=fc1ea68e05a14170ac6c5375fe73bd3d
(accessed September 26, 2012).
[2] “Herod’s
Temple Illustration,” http://www.bible-history.com/jewishtemple/JEWISH_TEMPLEHerods_Temple_Illustration.htm
(accessed September 26, 2012).
[3] Craig L.
Blomberg, The New American Commentary, Matthew,
(Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1992), p. 316.
[4] Donald
A. Hagner, Word Biblical Commentary, Matthew
14-28, (Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1995), p. 601.
[5] Craig S.
Keener, The IVP New Testament Commentary
Series, Matthew, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1997), p. 316.
[6] Ibid.,
p. 317.
While the Jewish leaders exploited the poor to enrich themselves, Jesus served the poor by exposing and opposing the robbery in the temple. In Acts 6, when the apostles did not keep track very well of the different amounts given to the poor, they appoint others, full of the Spirit, to focus on serving the poor widows; and the apostles remain poor themselves (silver and gold have I none).
ReplyDeleteIs it possible that many churches have preferred the "temple" or "synagogue" model of funneling "tithes" to the leaders (and buildings), at the expense of serving the poor? Most church budgets major on staff salaries and building maintenance; most of the money does not go to the poor.
Jesus said to sell treasured possessions and give to the poor; too many church leaders have said tithe your income and give to the church (i.e., to the leaders themselves, and the buildings they take pride in).
Dear Lucas,
DeleteThank you so much for your insightful comment to my post! You are, of course, correct that Jesus serves the poor by exposing the exploitation by the religious leaders. That was certainly part of what he was doing in this particular case. However, since not everyone who was being exploited was necessarily poor, Jesus must have had a broader purpose in his actions. Exploitation was part of the problem but irreverent occupation of the temple was an equally egregious offense. I believe Jesus’ irritation was fomented, as always, by a practice by the religious leaders and the religious system that constructed obstacles for people to be in relationship with God.
With respect to whether or not most churches use the “temple” or “synagogue” to funnel “tithes” to leaders or buildings and whether or not most church budgets are primarily concerned with staff salaries and facilities costs as opposed to giving to the poor is difficult to assert for me because I am not familiar with “most” churches only “some” churches. It is difficult for me to make a blanket statement to that affect. Here’s what I have experienced though. There are some who focus on austerity in an effort to give most of their money to the poor yet they do little to share the gospel with those who are lost. There are some who focus on bringing the lost into the church but do little or nothing to disciple them. There are some who spend a significant amount of time on discipleship yet spend little or no time serving the poor. The important thing for church leaders is to acknowledge that Jesus calls us to do all those things and then make an honest assessment of their ministry to determine if they are actually being faithful to what Jesus has called them to do and be. On certain occasions people would come to Jesus thinking they were doing things the right way just to be corrected that they were still missing something as in the case of the rich young ruler you referenced. However, it is important to keep in mind that that particular text is DEscriptive not PREscriptive. If we use it as prescriptive then we fall into legalism. For example, we are in danger of turning the duty to care for the poor into a contest of who cares the most based on who lives the most austere life in order to give anything extra to the poor. This was attempted during the monastic era of the church and failed miserably.
Thank you again for your commentary. If you have any questions or other comments, please feel free to respond.