Wednesday, October 31, 2012

The Tragedy of a Buried Talent


Introduction

            When I started this ministry more than a year ago, I was very small-minded about how I thought God might use it. I have to tell you that the last year has been an extremely humbling experience as more and more readers access the site every week from around the world. I keep a list of all the countries of the world on my desk and I pray over them every week as I’m preparing my lessons. I pray especially for those countries where accessing my lessons might cost someone their liberty or their life. I have no idea who they are and they have no allegiance to me except that I work hard to faithfully divide God’s word and share the truth of Jesus Christ with them. God has provided me with this opportunity to share the Scriptures with anyone and everyone who will listen as I seek to be faithful to the stated Mission of this ministry.

            I have watched the images from various nations who are determined to kill anyone and everyone necessary to advance their political or theocratic agenda. This is all a result of not having or rejecting the hope found only in Jesus Christ. Murder and terrorism will continue until the nations recognize and bow to the authority of Jesus Christ. However, that won’t happen unless someone first tells them that salvation is not found in establishing a utopian government or a biblical theocracy. Salvation is not found in the blissful coexistence of humanity living under the sovereign control of the state. Salvation is not found in the radical obedience to a barbaric religion that prizes martyrdom in the cause of killing people who aren’t of a like mind. Instead, “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” except Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ alone (Acts 4:12).

            I don’t know about you but sometimes I want something so badly that I get kind of neurotic about going after it. That neurosis served me well in my early years of trying to win in athletics and in my later years of grinding through graduate school. My neurosis is currently directed at something in particular that Jesus said that is tied to the mission of this ministry (Mt. 28:18-20). It has to do with Jesus’ teaching about the end of time. Jesus gives a litany of signs that will point to the end of time, i.e. wars, natural disasters, false prophets, etc. But Jesus says that these are all just signs of what is to come like birth pains are the sign of an impending birth. No, there is one thing that will signal the actual end of time—“And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come” (Mt. 24:14). Have you ever contemplated that possibility? Let me ask you this: Have you ever considered that you have a role to play in that? What if I told you that there are nearly three billion people in the world that have never heard the gospel? Your first thought might be that that is an absolutely overwhelming task to even think about. But what if I told you that there are more than two billion Christians in the world? Ahhh! Now you’re thinking aren’t you? That’s just one Christian telling just one or two other people who have never heard the gospel in order to fulfill Jesus’ prophetic words about the end of time. This would also mark the time of his return which is what we are all looking forward to aren’t we? Now that the task doesn’t seem quite so daunting, how do we go about accomplishing the task of preaching the gospel to the world? Well, I think the answer lies in taking advantage of the opportunities that God provides for us. In this vein, Jesus tells the story of the talents and that’s the basis for this week’s lesson.

Subject Text

Matthew 25:14-30

14 “Again, it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted his property to them. 15 To one he gave five talents of money, to another two talents, and to another one talent, each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The man who had received the five talents went at once and put his money to work and gained five more. 17 So also, the one with the two talents gained two more. 18 But the man who had received the one talent went off, dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money.
19 “After a long time the master of those servants returned and settled accounts with them. 20 The man who had received the five talents brought the other five. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with five talents. See, I have gained five more.’ 21 “His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’ 22 “The man with the two talents also came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with two talents; see, I have gained two more.’ 23 “His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’ 24 “Then the man who had received the one talent came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘I knew that you are a hard man, harvesting where you have not sown and gathering where you have not scattered seed. 25 So I was afraid and went out and hid your talent in the ground. See, here is what belongs to you.’ 26 “His master replied, ‘You wicked, lazy servant! So you knew that I harvest where I have not sown and gather where I have not scattered seed? 27 Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers, so that when I returned I would have received it back with interest. 28 “‘Take the talent from him and give it to the one who has the ten talents. 29 For everyone who has will be given more, and he will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him.
30 And throw that worthless servant outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’”

Context

            Our subject text begins with “Again, it will be like” which clearly points to a continuation of something Jesus said previously so if we want to understand the full meaning of this parable, we need to go back to see what the parable is intended to illustrate. We have to go all the way back to chapter 23 to see the events that lead up to our subject text. There, Jesus condemns the actions of the Pharisees and religious leaders who are constantly piling on religious requirements on the people of Israel somehow believing that they could perfect their behavior. Jesus, however, condemns their actions because going through the motions of following the letter of the law without simultaneously incorporating the spirit of the law which at its heart is justice, mercy and faithfulness misses the entire point of the law and the heart of God. At the end of chapter 23, Jesus grieves over Jerusalem and the fact that they have refused all of God’s attempts to reach out to them first through the prophets and now through him to see that all God really want is to be in a caring, loving relationship not unlike a mother hen cares for her chicks and protects them under her wings. Jesus is exasperated and proclaims that after he goes away (after, his death, resurrection and ascension to heaven) they will not see him again until he returns—this is what is known in Christianity as the “Second Coming” which will inaugurate the end of time or this age as we know it.

            This brings us to chapter 24 where Jesus’ disciples ask Jesus when all this will happen. At this point Jesus goes through a long litany of events that foreshadow the end of time—a signal of sorts but only as a means to warn us that the end is coming. Jesus does not say when the actual end will come. In fact, Jesus specifically says that no one knows when the end will come except the Father. Not even Jesus knows, at that point at least, when the end will come. [Can I just say something at this point as an aside? Reject anyone and everyone that says they know or are able to determine or calculate in some way when Jesus will return.] Jesus says the end will be sudden like the days of Noah and the flood. Until that time, we are to keep watch for his return and to be faithful and wise servants caring for everything and everyone he has entrusted to us. Jesus now tells a series of parables to illustrate what being faithful and wise looks like during his absence. The final parable he tells is our subject text which we can now look at in greater detail.

Text Analysis

            Jesus begins the parable in v. 14 by describing a man who is going on a journey who has called his servants together and has entrusted his property to them. The “man” in the parable is Jesus, the “journey” is his ascension to heaven, his “servants” are those who follow him and his “property” is his creation in its entirety.

            In v. 15 we see that the man in Jesus’ story gives three servants, five, two and one talent respectively then leaves on his long journey. A “talent” during Jesus’ day was Greek coinage. It is difficult to define the precise value of a talent because it was originally a measure of weight so its value varied based on monetary fluctuations. “But it was a very large amount of money, here probably silver coinage (cf. vv. 18, 27): one talent equaled 6,000 denarii (one denarius was the equivalent of a day’s wages for a common laborer). The talent was thus analogous to the modern ‘million.’”[1] It is important to remember that this parable is not necessarily about money. The parable is about all things entrusted to us, including but not limited to, money. Not all are entrusted with the same gifts and resources. Instead, some are given more while others are given less. The text is clear that God gives to everyone according to their abilities. The issue is not the amount given, or even what is given, but whether or not we are faithful with the things that have been entrusted to us which includes the opportunities to share the Good News of Jesus Christ.

            In vv. 16-18 we see that the first two servants immediately put their talents two work doubling what their master had entrusted to them. The text implies that they took a risk and it paid off with a 100% return on their respective investments. The third servant, however, took no risk. Instead, out of fear, he buried his talent and received nothing in return for what was entrusted to him by his master. “Most people lacked capital, but those who had it could multiply their investment fivefold or even tenfold; doubling one’s investment might be regarded as a reasonable minimum return in the ancient economy. Burying money kept the capital safe, but the money would have been no less safe with bankers.”[2]

            The text in vv. 19-25 tells us that the master returns after a long time and summons his servants to account for what they did with what the master entrusted to them. Both the first and second servant report that they have double what the master entrusted them with. In both cases, the master lavishes his servants with praise as he says, “Well done, good and faithful servant!” But in addition, both servants are also rewarded with added responsibilities because they “have been faithful with a few things.” It is important to note that the master responds exactly the same to both servants irrespective of how much was given to either. All that matters was that they were faithful with what was entrusted to them. The servants are then invited to join in their master’s happiness. Let’s step out of this parable long enough to remember that Jesus is using the parable to point to something real; something greater; something eternal! The parable connotes that our faithfulness in this life will impact the level or our responsibilities in the life and Kingdom to come at the end of the age. Furthermore, the invitation to share in the master’s happiness is an invitation to the blessings of enjoying God for eternity. “Jesus’ ethical principles are determined by his extraordinary affirmation that life, here and hereafter, is to be lived in the presence of God. It is from that central claim that all the statements about reward issue; God himself is the ultimate reward.”[3]

            The celebratory tone quickly turns to one of disappointment and condemnation in vv. 24-27 as the final servant gives account of what was entrusted to him. The servant reports with only the money that was given to him which he returns. He comments about the character of the master that seems so odd in light the previous verses. We just got finished looking at how the first two servants double the money originally entrusted to them and without any reference to the master’s character either positively or negatively. “This servant imagines his master as unjust or capricious, likening him to a farmer who harvests fields he did not plant. Such a view of God proliferated among ancient religions and unfortunately recurs far too often among Christians as well.”[4] (If this is your view of God, please refer to a previous post titled: Finding Punchinello; Label—Pastoral Care; Date—2/15/12) The master has harsh words for the servant calling him “wicked” and “lazy!” These are harsh words indeed but should shock us when we step back out of the parable and realize again that Jesus is talking about some of us! The text does not say whether or not the servant correctly characterizes the master and his response does not help us make that determination. So the focus should be on the actions of the servant as opposed to the character of the master in this case. The servant could have deposited the money at the bank without much effort and gained interest on the money. Failing to do so makes him, at the very least, simply lazy. Being called “lazy” is one thing, but “wicked” is quite another. Yet think about this for a moment. The text says that the servant returned all of the master’s money. However, if you’re familiar with finances, you’re familiar with the concept of “time value of money” or “opportunity loss.” The concept assumes that there is always an investment that is available (i. e. savings deposit, certificate of deposit, etc.) with a relatively high degree of security even if the return is relatively low. Here’s how it works: If you took $100 and buried in the ground today, tomorrow it would be worth less than $100 effectively because the opportunity to gain interest on that same money had it been safely invested is lost while inflation erodes monetary value. Sorry if I got too deep in the weeds with that explanation but my point is that the servant actually cost his master money by burying it. Considering how simple it would have been to deposit the money in the bank, this not only makes him lazy but wicked as well for costing his master the time value of money and this is a significant contributing factor to The Tragedy of a Buried Talent.

            The consequences of the first and third servant’s actions is announced in vv. 28-30 when the master orders that the one talent from the last servant be taken from him and given to the one who now has ten talents with the proclamation that the one who is faithful with what is entrusted to him will be entrusted with more and the one who is unfaithful will lose what little he may have. Then the master issues the final most dramatic order that the unfaithful servant be cast out. Jesus uses the familiar idiom where those who are condemned be cast into the “darkness, where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth.” This idiom was common and understood as the place of eternal punishment; hell! “Like the wicked servant, those who fail to use the gifts God has given them for His service will be punished by separation from God and all things good. This seems appropriate both for those who are overtly hostile to God and his revelation and for those who profess commitment to him but show no evidence in their lives of the reality they profess.”[5]

Application

            This parable by Jesus is jarring for most of us here in America because we are blessed with so many resources to use to advance God’s Kingdom and the Gospel message. It is very important to remember that this parable is not primarily about being good stewards of financial resources. While this is clearly one area of responsibility, there are so many more where we must utilize the unique gifts we have each been given. The question we must all ask ourselves is whether or not we are holding anything back from advancing the message of Jesus Christ—whether that is in our words or deeds. You might not be able to go to another country to care for those in need but you can care for someone in your own neighborhood. You might not be able to provide clean water to villagers in Africa but you can give money to organizations that do. The point is that you have at your disposal resources that you have been blessed with that are unique to you. Are you using them to advance God’s Kingdom? I know some of you consistently do everything you can to advance God’s Kingdom and I applaud you for that even though I know you don’t want or expect applause. Some of you, however, are stuck; you don’t know what to do; you might even be afraid to do something. I’d like to challenge all of you to try something for at least the next month.

At the beginning of this lesson I told you that I have a list of all the countries on my desk that I pray over every week. I also referenced my tendency for various neuroses. Well my current ministry neurosis is to somehow get someone from every country to access this ministry site. There are 203 countries in the world (183 sovereign countries and 20 non-sovereign, separately administered territories). To date, the site has been accessed by someone from 51 different countries. I can tell you that I don’t know people in a majority of those countries. I don’t know exactly how it came to be accessed in all those countries except that it was passed along from one person to another to another. I have been tremendously humbled to see some of the countries where the site is being accessed. We take for granted in America that we can turn on our computer and browse and read whatever we want. But in some parts of the world accessing Christian material is a death sentence and this ministry has been accessed in some of those places. That is something only God could have directed. So how, you might be wondering, can we reach the other countries that have yet to access the site?

The only way I know to expand access to this site is if you will share the site link with as many people as you can. Part of our responsibility is to take advantage of the easy opportunities that God provides for us along the way to spread the Good News of Jesus Christ. I’ve already done the work so all you have to do is pass it on. Let me first address a few objections I’m sure many of you will have to this challenge. 1) Some of you are cynical and skeptical when you hear a pastor say “bring your family, friends and neighbors” because your experience tells you that what they were really interested in was building attendance that usually translated into more financial resources for higher salaries, bigger staffs and nicer facilities. Let me put your mind at ease in this respect. There’s nothing in this for me financially because I make nothing from this ministry. All ministry expenses come directly out of my own pocket funded by my carpentry work. This site is not and will not be monetized. 2) If it is too dangerous to share the site link because of the country you live in, you have my permission to copy or print whatever you want and share it in whole or in part with anyone. You don’t even have to give me credit. In fact, you can take all the credit for yourself if you want. 3) If you don’t know the best way to share the site link, I’ve made it really easy for you. At the end of each post you will see the ability to share the site via numerous social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, Email or g+1.

Let me conclude by saying that I’m not above begging so if I have to beg then I beg you to share this site with as many people as you can and ask them to do the same. I said earlier that there’s nothing in this for me financially but I confess that one of the things that motivates me is the possibility that I will stand before God one day and He will say: “Well done good and faithful servant!” Will you hear those words? Do you even care if you hear those words? “The NT teaches, as did apocalyptic writers, that history is moving inexorably toward a telos, a goal which will not be reached fully by historical processes. This goal-oriented view of history does not, however, diminish the significance of the present age…On the contrary, this present age is most significant as Christians proclaim and live out the good news that brings about transformation in the lives of individuals and in the world. Such faithful service during the master’s absence will elicit God’s “well done” when the final reckoning takes place (cf. Mt. 25:23).”[6] Sharing the link for this site is not one of those things that requires special spiritual gifting. It requires that you push a few buttons and that’s it! It’s so easy! Please do it for your own sake as if you had been entrusted with one simple talent. Sharing this site link would be like investing that talent. Take a risk and see how God might multiply that investment. At least when you’re called to account, you won’t have to confess that you just buried the talent entrusted to you and suffer the consequences that go with that. If you do nothing, you might find yourself repeating The Tragedy of a Buried Talent!


[1] Donald A. Hagner, Matthew 14-28, Word Biblical Commentary, (Dallas, TX: Word Books, 1995), p. 734.
[2] Craig S. Keener, Matthew, Downers Grove, IL:, InterVarsity Press, 1997), pp. 358-359.
[3] Joel B. Green, Scot McKnight, I. Howard Marshall, eds., Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1992), p. 216.
[4] Craig L. Blomberg, Matthew, New American Commentary, (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1992), p. 373.
[5] Blomberg, Matthew, NAC, pp. 374-375.
[6] Joel B. Green, et al, eds., Jesus and the Gospels, p. 26.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

When The Going Gets Tough...


Introduction

            As some of you know, both my daughters are in college pursuing careers in medicine in one form or another. The process of pursuing their respective fields began first and foremost on their knees as they sought God’s guidance for their lives. I am so proud that they were intentional about the process—their final decision had nothing to do with money or prestige. In the end, they decided on their respective fields because they believed it was the direction God was leading them and placed a passion within them to do so—they believe they have been “called” to their respective fields. However, as you might imagine, the actual process of being faithful to that calling has been far from easy. I have received tearful calls from both of them with my youngest daughter being the latest questioning whether or not they heard God’s calling correctly because the road is very difficult. Having gone through this sort of thing myself (sometimes daily) I knew that I just needed to get her past the moment of doubt to get back to the point where she was again certain about her calling.

            I’ve often talked to my girls about what the life of faith looks like and that God’s calling does not necessarily mean that if we are faithful to that calling, life will be easy and smooth. Yet I too have struggled in the past and continue to struggle on occasion with whether or not I heard God’s calling correctly for my life of ministry. After my discussion with my daughter about her doubts I began to think that perhaps there are many others who struggle with this same issue in their lives. I realized that there was a very prominent biblical figure who experienced the exact same thing so I wanted to look at his story this week and perhaps come to a more biblical understanding about the dynamic that is behind our doubt.

Subject Text

            Luke 7:18-23

            [11 Soon afterward, Jesus went to a town called Nain, and his disciples and a large crowd went along with him. 12 As he approached the town gate, a dead person was being carried out—the only son of his mother, and she was a widow. And a large crowd from the town was with her. 13 When the Lord saw her, his heart went out to her and he said, “Don’t cry.” 14 Then he went up and touched the bier they were carrying him on, and the bearers stood still. He said, “Young man, I say to you, get up!” 15 The dead man sat up and began to talk, and Jesus gave him back to his mother. 16 They were all filled with awe and praised God. “A great prophet has appeared among us,” they said. “God has come to help his people.” 17 This news about Jesus spread throughout Judea and the surrounding country.]

18 John’s disciples told him about all these things. Calling two of them, 19 he sent them to the Lord to ask, “Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?” 20 When the men came to Jesus, they said, “John the Baptist sent us to you to ask, ‘Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?’” 21 At that very time Jesus cured many who had diseases, sicknesses and evil spirits, and gave sight to many who were blind. 22 So he replied to the messengers, “Go back and report to John what you have seen and heard: The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is proclaimed to the poor. 23 Blessed is anyone who does not stumble on account of me.”

Context

            I’ve included the bracketed text because it gives some point-of-contact context for our subject text and includes the description of some events that make the comments made by John in our subject text all the more perplexing. But first, since there are so many people named “John” in the Bible, I want to make sure we’re all on the same page with respect to which “John” we’re talking about here. The “John” in our subject text is “John the Baptist.” Some of you might be wondering why this John wasn’t with Jesus during Jesus’ ministry. Well there are a couple of reasons for this: 1) After Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and people began following Jesus, some of John’s disciples came to him and asked him about it and John said at that time that Jesus must become greater and he must become less (Jn 3:30); and 2) John was beheaded a year before Jesus was crucified and was in prison for 12-18 months before that so it was not really possible for them to be together during Jesus’ short, three year ministry. Our subject text, takes place during the time when John the Baptist was in prison so we must naturally ask, why was John in prison? Well the short answer is that John was put in prison for doing exactly what he was called to do—to encourage the people to repent of their sins and point the way to Jesus. In keeping with his calling, John confronted King Herod about his sinful conduct. Herod took his brother Philip’s wife, Herodias, and married her which was unlawful. Consequently, Herod had John arrested and put in prison (Mk 6:17-18).

            In the bracketed text above which immediately precedes our subject text, we find Jesus in the small town of Nain where he encounters the funeral procession of a young man who has died followed by the mourning crowd of family and friends. Jesus is moved by the grief of the mother who is already a widow and has now lost her only son. The procession stopped as Jesus approached and touched the coffin. Jesus commands the young man to rise and the crowd is astounded as the man comes to life and is reunited with his mother. The crowd gives praise and proclaims that “God has come to help his people” (cf. Mt 1:23b). And wasn’t this precisely John’s calling—to announce the coming of the Messiah? John’s father, Zechariah, prophesied that John would, in fact, be the prophet of the “Most High” and would prepare the way for the coming Messiah (Lk 1:76). John fulfilled this prophecy in part when he called people to repent of their sins and be baptized but ultimately when he baptized and announced the arrival of Jesus as the One they had all been waiting for—the One he had been waiting for. This then brings us to our subject text and John’s battle with doubt When The Going Gets Tough.

Text Analysis

            Given the context of the previous verses, vv. 18-19 present us with an interesting paradox: John’s foremost calling was the announcement of the coming Messiah. John fulfilled that calling and more, he was the one to baptize Jesus and witnessed, firsthand, as the Father and the Holy Spirit confirm that Jesus is the One they had been waiting for—hoping for—longing for. Now, sitting in a prison cell, John sends his disciples to ask Jesus if he is the One or if they should be looking for someone else. The text is pointedly relevant to our own lives. “The question intimates the inadequacy of the popular perception of Jesus. Popular perceptions are often wrong. In the case of Jesus, they are also short of the mark…The question John asks shocks some students of the Scriptures, who cannot accept the fact that John doubts Jesus…Even the best of God’s servants need reassurance from time to time.”[1] What was really at the root of John’s question do you suppose? I believe that John is not so different than any other person enduring a significant hardship in their lives. Where there was once certainty, there is now creeping doubt because there is a certain expectation of outcome and when that outcome is not realized, certainty is replaced by doubt. Instead, what should be considered is the possibility that our expectations were incorrect. John expected Jesus to fulfill the well known prophesies of the conquering Messiah and while Jesus fulfilled those expectations from an eschatological perspective, John expected them to be fulfilled primarily from a temporal perspective. It is unlikely that John expected to be in prison when the Messiah was introduced. However, in prison is precisely where he finds himself and doubts begin to creep into his mind so he now wants some reassurance from Jesus.

            In v. 20 we see that John’s disciples find Jesus and ask him John’s question about whether he is the One. V. 21 tells us that while John’s disciples are questioning him, Jesus is curing those sick and diseased that were coming to him or were brought to him. Similarly, he was casting out evil spirits and giving sight back to those who were blind. We can almost picture the scene as Jesus turns to John’s disciples and then back to the throngs of people who must certainly be celebrating their newfound wholeness. We picture John’s disciples looking past Jesus as perhaps a man once lame now casts aside his crutches and dances with his wife again, or perhaps a blind mother sees her beautiful child for the first time, or a small child doomed to a short life in bed because of some disease now runs and plays with all the other kids. Did John’s disciples need to see or hear more? Nevertheless, Jesus gives them an answer in v. 22 that they will immediately recognize as the words of the prophet Isaiah (Isa 29:18, 19; 35:5, 6; 61:1, 2). “First, Luke notes that Jesus ‘gave’ sight, using an unexpected verb associated with benefaction. This, combined with the narrators identification of Jesus as ‘Lord’ in v. 19, underscores for Luke’s reader that Jesus’ identity is secure even if someone as credentialed within the narrative as John has questions…Jesus is the beneficent Lord who gives graciously especially to those on the margins of society. Second, ‘blindness’ has a metaphorical sense that is not far from the surface here, even though we may presume that physical healing is primarily in view. Jesus’ ensuing instructions to John’s disciples to tell John what they have seen and heard suggests his designation of these persons as witnesses who will enlighten John regarding this transformation of the connotations of messiahship.”[2]

            Jesus leaves John’s disciples with some parting words in v. 23 intended as encouragement and warning not only to those listening at the time but that transcend time and space to reach out to us in the trials, tribulations, pain and suffering of our daily lives today. Jesus is saying that continuing to trust him even in the most difficult times will be worth it even if doing so appears to the contrary. “The key to this beatitude is its personal focus on Jesus. He is the issue, and those who deal with what God is doing must deal with him. Those who doubt are called to trust in him.”[3]

Application

            We must make a distinction between “doubt” and “unbelief.” Whereas “unbelief” is the absence of belief, “doubt” is the absence or lack of understanding and/or perspective. John believed who Jesus was if for no other reason than his witness at Jesus’ baptism. Yet he doubted because he had a perspective and understanding of what the Messiah was supposed to look like and Jesus did not seem to align with that Messianic perspective. And this is precisely the struggle we have today when we face difficulty and hardship. When you think about it, what is the most common factor associated with believers (and sometimes unbelievers) when they experience hardships? They desperately reach out to God for answers and comfort. Now what is the common factor associated with some believers (and most unbelievers) when things are running smoothly? They rarely reach out to God. I’m not insisting that God’s only or even primary purpose for allowing hardship in our lives is so that we turn to him, but it is definitely a resulting consequence. When my daughter called me last week in tears because of how hard her classes are, she kept telling me that she was wondering if she heard God’s calling for her life correctly and that she had been pleading with Him to reassure her that she was, in fact, being obedient to Him. She was beginning to doubt not because she stopped believing what she once was convinced was God’s calling, she began to doubt because her perspective led her to believe that if God was calling her to something, it couldn’t possibly be so hard to get there. To be honest, I know those tears, I too have shed those tears after my third year of graduate school, after my seventh year of graduate school and then after finishing graduate school in ten years with no traditional pastoral ministry in sight. My doubt wasn’t because I didn’t believe that God called me to ministry, my doubt was the result of a perspective that told me that God’s calling had to look the way I thought it should look. When it didn’t, I constantly sought God’s direction and guidance. I desperately wanted to be obedient to what He was calling me to do but it looked so different in my mind than the way it was playing out in my life. What has been the result of this process for me? A daily focus on seeking God! And this is perhaps the primary point that God is trying to make when we are struggling with trials and hardships—are we focused on the calling we were once certain about—the good life we thought God would provide or are we focused on God? For my daughter, her moment of doubt has passed for now as she prepares with confidence in her calling for her first medical mission trip next week. You see, God drew her closer to Himself through her struggle so she could pursue her calling more dependent and focused on Him.

            “Sometimes God is doing something powerful, but we miss it because of our expectations of what he should do and how. John anticipated Jesus would take an instant road to glory. When he did not, John had questions. How often do we fall into the same trap? We sometimes expect God to do something a certain way, and when he does not, we think that he has failed. Such expectations may cover a variety of things—from God’s helping to make a certain business situation successful, to God’s promising to heal us from a debilitating condition, to our expectation that the Christian life will be free of hardship. Any of the preconditions for how God must work may work against us when he chooses to build character by taking us down a harder road.”[4] This is a trap we do not have to fall into when we encounter difficulties, hardships, pain and suffering because When The Going Gets Tough…the tough humbly seek and trust God.


[1] Darrell L. Bock, Luke, The NIV Application Commentary, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), p. 210.
[2] Joel B. Green, NICNT, The Gospel of Luke, (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997), pp. 296-297.
[3] Darrell L. Bock, ECNT, Luke, (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1994), p. 669.
[4] Bock, NIV, Luke, pp. 213-214.

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

The Church is Silenced for 30 Pieces of Silver


Introduction

            For many of us the term “30 pieces of silver,” conjures up images from antiquity of that sniveling little weasel, Judas, slinking through back alleys at night shrouding his face in the hope of going unnoticed. We picture him peeking around corners to make sure the coast is clear until he finds himself at the entrance to the place where the chief priests are meeting. We can imagine the arrogant chief priests wringing their hands and pacing the floor debating the best way to deal with Jesus who is drawing the crowds away from them and to himself. Suddenly, a servant interrupts with an unexpected visitor. The mood in the room goes from an angst “what are we gonna do?” to a jubilant “can you believe our luck?” in the matter of moments when Judas offers to make a deal with them to hand over Jesus. The only thing that remains is the terms of the deal. I haven’t always been a simple carpenter and pastor. In another life, I managed and negotiated multi-million dollar real estate deals. There were countless factors that went into the value of a deal but the one most important element that impacted the value of a deal without fail was this: The higher the return on the investment, the higher the price. Not a surprise really, this is a fairly universal and fundamental principle. Therefore, considering who Jesus was, Judas was looking at a serious payday—or so one would think. So what was the deal Judas made to betray Jesus? 30 pieces of silver—Judas sold out God for 30 pieces of silver! But maybe it was worth it—what do you think? How did it turn out for Judas? Let’s see: He immediately regretted what he did and unsuccessfully tried to return the 30 pieces of silver, he went outside the city and hung himself and then his body broke from the hangman’s noose and his body smashed on the rocks below and burst open—was it worth 30 pieces of silver? You know the story, you see the images in your mind and all you can do is shake your head in disgust. At the same time we nervously insist that we would never do anything so ridiculously tragic. We would never sell out God—well at least not knowingly, right?

            The foremost complaint that unbelievers have about the Church today is that it is irrelevant. “Irrelevant” is defined fairly simply as: 1) Unimportant, and/or 2) Not applicable. By extension, unbelievers define the Church as unimportant and/or not applicable to their lives! Researcher George Barna writes,

“The stumbling block for the Church is not its theology but its failure to apply what it believes in compelling ways. The downfall of the Church has not been the content of its message but its failure to practice those truths…Those who have turned to Christianity and churches seeking truth and meaning have left empty-handed, confused by the apparent inability of Christians themselves to implement the principles they profess. Churches, for the most part, have failed to address the nagging anxieties and deep-seated fears of the people, focusing instead upon outdated or secondary issues proposing tired or trite solutions. The profound practical irrelevance of Christian teaching, combined with the lack of perceived value associated with Christian church life, has resulted in a burgeoning synthetic faith.”[1]

            As a pastor, those are painful words to hear but I know they are true. I see how some Christians try desperately to make a difference, and they do in a small way, but it’s in the context of the efforts of an individual believer or as a relatively small group of believers not as the “Body of Christ” acting in a uniform effort to advance the gospel and transform the culture. And this failure, I am placing squarely at the feet of church leaders. It is their duty and responsibility to instruct and guide their respective flocks as a unified body of believers by educating them, admonishing them, encouraging them and finally by showing them.

            I have no doubt that most pastors believe they are doing just that but clearly they are missing the mark in some way. Like most things, there aren’t any simple answers to this problem. Nevertheless, as with any struggling institution, if you want to begin solving systemic problems that plague the Church as an institution, you must first follow the money. This week, a copy of a letter received by another pastor crossed my desk from Reverend Barry W. Lynn, Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State. It was a form letter addressed generally to “Religious Leader.” In the letter, Lynn reminds recipients of the letter that there is a strict prohibition against endorsing any particular political candidate when institutions are approved as IRS Section 501(c)(3) Tax Exempt Organizations. The letter references the severe penalties historically levied against religious organizations that have violated this tax law. The information in the letter is technically accurate. However, it is also a thinly veiled threat that pastors had better remember their place and watch what they say from the pulpit. Consequently, church leaders willingly abandon their freedom and responsibility to speak out.

            As a pastor or some other church leader, are you prepared to look into God’s face with the answer that you would have jeopardized your 501(c)(3) tax status if you had spoken out in the face of a culture in moral and spiritual decline? Don’t mistake my point here, this is not about which political party or candidate is best or which issue is the most important. Our culture did not get to this point because of the failings of any one political party or because of one specific sinful behavior. Our culture got to this point because the Church has been irrelevant—because church leaders are afraid to take a stand. Many of the people in our churches are indifferent about the moral and spiritual decline in our country because they don’t see their church leaders take a strong stand for fear of drawing the ire of the Internal Revenue Service. Is it any wonder that a watching, unbelieving world thinks the Church is irrelevant? The Church wants to avoid paying taxes so it keeps quiet about relevant people who drive relevant issues in the lives of the people of the Church as well as those the Church is trying to reach! This is what happens when The Church is Silenced for 30 Pieces of Silver. No one likes paying taxes but paying taxes has been part of virtually every civilized culture throughout history. Jesus talked specifically about paying taxes that I’d like to take a look at this week.

Subject Text

Matthew 22:15-22

15 Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap him in his words.
16 They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. “Teacher,” they said, “we know that you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You aren’t swayed by others, because you pay no attention to who they are. 17 Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay the imperial tax to Caesar or not?” 18 But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, “You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? 19 Show me the coin used for paying the tax.” They brought him a denarius, 20 and he asked them, “Whose image is this? And whose inscription?” 21 “Caesar’s,” they replied. Then he said to them, “So give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.” 22 When they heard this, they were amazed. So they left him and went away.

Context

            You have to go back to the previous chapter to understand the setting and significance for these verses. Remember that the day before our subject text takes place was Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem and the clearing of the temple (See previous post—Title: Turning the Church into a Den of Robbers, Label: Pastoral Care, Date: 10/3/12). After a confrontation with the religious leaders, Jesus leaves the city. For our subject text, Jesus has come back to the city and has entered the temple again and is teaching the people. No doubt the religious leaders are still seething from the events of the previous day. Jesus’ teachings center around the pronouncement that God’s Kingdom was open to anyone willing to enter. Jesus is inaugurating a new age illustrated with the parable of the wedding feast at the beginning of chapter 22. The parable tells the story of a wedding celebration for the king’s son (Jesus) where the invited guests (Israel) refused to come to the celebration. Consequently the king sent his servants (Old Testament Prophets) out to invite his guests (Israel) personally but they beat and killed his servants. So the king sent his army to kill those who refused to come and burned the city (perhaps a foretelling of the destruction of the temple in 70 A. D.). The king then sent his servants (perhaps Jesus’ disciples) to invite anyone, good and bad, to fill the wedding hall to celebrate his son (Jesus). Now that the religious leaders are sufficiently fuming with anger, we move on to our subject text as the religious leaders continue their schemes to trap Jesus into saying something they could use to have him arrested and condemn him.

Text Analysis

            Vv. 15-16a make clear that the religious leaders had no interest in being taught by Jesus. They weren’t even partisan bystanders. They were there specifically to trap Jesus with his answers to their questions. But what was the point of bringing along the Herodians? I’ll try and give you a thumbnail sketch without getting too deeply into the weeds on the subject but it will be helpful to understanding the forces at work during the time of Jesus. Who were the Herodians? It is best to describe the Herodians as “accomodatists.” Herod the Great was king of Jerusalem at the time of Jesus’ birth. However, Herod was not a Jew. His father was an Edomite who converted to Judaism. Herod was appointed king of Jerusalem by the Roman Senate because of his ability to keep the peace (“pax romana” = Roman peace) between all the competing parties in the region. Herod recognized and generally practiced the customs of the Jews. However, he was quite clever in doing so without offending the various Roman religions. He easily moved to recognize whatever religion was necessary to advance and maintain peace. The Herodians were not necessarily descendants of Herod but aligned themselves with Herod socio-economically, politically and religiously. The Herodians were closely associated with the Sadducees who aligned themselves with the Hasmonean dynasty which immediately preceded the Herodian dynasty. “In summary, the Herodians were theologically in agreement with the Sadducees and politically both of these parties would have been the opposite of the Pharisees who were anti-Hasmonean, anti-Herodian and anti-Roman. The Pharisees looked for a cataclysmic messianic kingdom to remove the rule of the Herods and Rome, whereas the Herodians wanted to preserve the Herodian rule. However, the Herodians and the Pharisees worked together to oppose Jesus, because he was introducing a new kingdom that neither wanted.”[2] V. 16b records just how dastardly they are as they, in the hearing of everyone present, characterize Jesus as someone who can’t possibly give a wrong answer thinking that they have formulated a question that will illicit an answer that will lead to Jesus’ precipitous fall in the eyes of his followers; they believe they have the perfect lose-lose question that will trap Jesus.

            V. 17 presents us with the question the conspirators think will give them what they needed as an indictment against Jesus; “is it right to pay taxes to Caesar?” Remember the two sides representing the question: The Pharisees who opposed Caesar’s rule and the Herodians who supported Caesar’s rule. They believe there is no right answer to the question. It is important to remember what kind of tax is being discussed here. “This is not the same tax as in 17:24-27 since there Peter was asked about the Jewish temple tax commanded by the Torah. The poll tax for Judea at issue here went to support the foreign, pagan oppressors.”[3]

            In v. 18 Jesus immediately recognizes their evil intentions as hated enemies are suddenly curious allies. Jesus gives the answer that transcends time and culture in vv. 19-21a. Jesus first asks to see a coin that was used to pay the tax. He was presented with a denarius. “The silver denarius of Tiberius, including a portrait of his head, minted especially at Lyon, circulated there in this period and is probably in view here. The coin related directly to pagan Roman religion and the imperial cult in the East: one side bore Caesar’s image and the words ‘Tiberius Caesar, son of the Divine Augustus,’ while the other side referred to the high priest of Roman religion.”[4] Jesus asks them to identify the image on the coin whom they correctly identify as Caesar.

            In v. 21B Jesus then gives us the now famous answer to the question when he says that we should give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and we are to give to God what belongs to God. In this brief answer, Jesus gives a principle to be applied throughout the ages: Payment of tax, according to the law, is not an implicit or explicit approval of or agreement with the institution imposing the tax. Nor is the payment of the tax specifically an offense against God. What is important is that we give to God those things that are specifically reserved for God alone such as worship and obedience to his Word. Jesus recognizes that organized and civilized societies require governance and that governments don’t have a means to fund themselves outside of imposing a tax. It is important to remember that although governments cannot exist without the cooperation (voluntary or forced) of people, people cannot exist for long, in any context, without God. The brilliance of Jesus’ answer is not lost on his questioners in v. 22 as they leave in amazement.

Application

            Jesus’ answer appears to set the stage that perpetuates the idea the Jesus is separating the institutions of the Church and the State. But nothing could be farther from the truth. You see, Jesus understood that the two can and must exist in harmony with the understanding that both have a specific purpose within God’s created order. Both institutions must, however, operate under the authority of God’s will. Any society that fails to do so necessarily operates in opposition to itself and will eventually collapse. Having said that, it is the Church’s responsibility to point all people and institutions toward God and the truth of God’s Word. Therefore, the State must advance the efforts of the Church by allowing its free expression and assembly and the Church must aid the efforts of the State by contributing to the State’s financial solvency so that the Church can continue in its efforts to point all people toward God. The failure of one to support the efforts of the other necessarily leads to the eventual deterioration of society at large; and isn’t this precisely where we find ourselves today? Today, the Church has limited freedom of expression specifically because it has made arrangements to forego supporting the State by paying taxes. I can already hear the howling from pastors around the country who will insist that the money they save from having to pay taxes pays for programs to care for the poor yet they are unable to publicly condemn the policymakers specifically who pass legislation that creates the financial environment leading to the very poverty they are now serving to alleviate; they pay for groups to go to under-achieving schools to help in the class or with after school programs to provide the education the children don’t receive in the classroom yet they are unable to condemn the specific elected officials that perpetuate a failing educational system they are now trying to supplement; or they pay to organize groups that go to abortion facilities to protest against murdering babies yet they are unable to condemn specific public figures that appropriate the taxes revenues that fund the very abortion providers that the Church is protesting against. The Church has removed itself from an aspect of society that impacts everyone—believer and unbeliever alike. As such, the Church has failed to do what Jesus instructed in our subject verses; to give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and have willingly forfeited their duty to give to God what is God’s. What good is the Church if it will not speak freely with respect to all areas of people’s lives? These are all very important issues and if the Church will not speak; will not take a stand, then what good is it? The Church therefore voluntarily renders itself irrelevant in the larger context of society simply because it wants to avoid paying taxes. During the civil rights movement Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it. Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about the things that matter.” Is it worth it? Can the Church and its leaders stand before God with a clear conscience and explain why The Church is Silenced for 30 Pieces of Silver?


[1] George Barna, The Second Coming of the Church, (Nashville, TN: Word Publishing, 1998), pp. 5-6.
[2] Joel B. Green, Scot McKnight, I. Howard Marshall, eds., Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1992), p. 325.
[3] Craig L. Blomberg, Matthew, The New American Commentary, (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1992), p. 331.
[4] Grant R. Osborne, D. Stuart Briscoe, Haddon Robinson, eds, Matthew, The IVP New Testament Commentary Series, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1997), p. 326.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

The Foolishness of the Cross


Introduction

            Is there any doubt in anyone’s mind that Albert Einstein was a genius? He was a brilliant physicist that developed the Special & General Theory of Relativity including the famous equation of “e=mc2” which was used in the development of many modern innovations like, the television, the remote control, lasers and the atomic bomb just to name a few. He received the Nobel Prize in Physics and was named by TIME magazine as the “Person of the Century” in 1999. To say he was really smart is probably an insult. This week, it was announced that one of his letters referred to as Einstein’s “God” letter was being sold on eBay with a starting bid at $3 million! I had never heard of this “God” letter and figured it must have had some brilliant theological insights. Well, before I tell you what I think, I’ve included the relevant excerpt from the letter below so you could read it for yourself:

            “The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change this.

For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions…The Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything ‘chosen’ about them.”[1]

            Well there you have it! If Einstein the genius says it then that must be the definitive word on the subject of God’s existence right? A smart guy like that can’t possibly be wrong; I mean he has that whole “e=mc2” thing going for him! My area of expertise is in theology not in science but I know from my basic science classes that there are some basic and universal principles of scientific inquiry; 1) Pose significant questions that can be investigated empirically; 2) Link research to theory; 3) Use methods that permit direct investigation of question; 4) Provide coherent chain of rigorous reasoning; 5) Replicate and generalize; and 6) Transparency and scholarly debate.[2] Although I’m not certain, I’m guessing Einstein used some form of this methodology in his own scientific research. I think it’s definitely safe to say that Einstein probably did not reach a conclusion before going through these steps. Yet one short sentence from Einstein’s “God” letter reveals that this is precisely what he has done when it comes to his belief in God when he writes, “No interpretation, no matter how subtle, can (for me) change this.” That doesn’t sound like a very scientific approach. Instead, Einstein has reached a conclusion that God does not exist and no amount of evidence or explanation to the contrary could have changed his conclusion.

            Some people seem to think that smart people are just too smart to believe in God. I mean Einstein must know since he’s so smart right? But you can see by his own words that he has concluded that God doesn’t exist without the same benefit of inquiry that I’m sure he would insist on when doing scientific research. I can see how some people might not believe in God because they see that there are some really “smart” people that don’t believe in God. But that principle can work the other way as well. When I was going through seminary, I was consistently amazed at the brilliance of all my professors. However, my New Testament professor, Dr. Craig Blomberg, was so freakishly smart that I almost felt sorry for him that he had to deal with people like me. Let me just give you a brief bio of Dr. Blomberg: He completed his B. A. Summa Cum Laude from Augustana College, he received his M. A. from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, and he received his Ph. D. from University of Aberdeen, Scotland. He was a Research Fellow in Cambridge, England working with InterVarsity Christian Fellowship. He is fluent in biblical Hebrew and Greek. He has authored or edited twenty books as well as submitted countless scholarly articles. What I’m trying to say is that he is really, really smart. I remember sitting in his class, probably lost during one of his lectures, thinking that God must exist if someone so smart believes in him. I can’t say whether he was or wasn’t as smart as Einstein but it illustrates my point that belief in God is not a matter of intelligence.

For those of us who are believers, God becoming incarnate in the person of Jesus Christ and dying on the cross to pay for our sins so that we could be reconciled to God makes perfect sense. However, the Hebrews of Jesus’ day couldn’t accept a Savior that didn’t conform to their image of a conquering Messiah that would liberate them from Roman occupation. The Greeks couldn’t accept a God that was too weak to save himself from being nailed to a cross. Einstein calls the notion of God “childish.” Some unbelievers might agree with that but most just consider belief in a God that allowed himself to be put to death as foolishness. It is The Foolishness of the Cross that is so often the obstacle to their belief regardless of how smart they might be. And that is the point of my lesson this week so let’s take a look at the relationship between the Bible and unbelievers the world considers wise and intellectually reliable.

1 Corinthians 1:18-2:5

18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written: “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate.” 20 Where is the wise person? Where is the teacher of the law? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe. 22 Jews demand signs and Greeks look for wisdom, 23 but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, 24 but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength. 26 Brothers and sisters, think of what you were when you were called. Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were of noble birth. 27 But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. 28 God chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things—and the things that are not—to nullify the things that are, 29 so that no one may boast before him. 30 It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God—that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption. 31 Therefore, as it is written: “Let the one who boasts boast in the Lord.”

And so it was with me, brothers and sisters. When I came to you, I did not come with eloquence or human wisdom as I proclaimed to you the testimony about God. 2 For I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus Christ and him crucified. 3 I came to you in weakness with great fear and trembling. 4 My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirit’s power, 5 so that your faith might not rest on human wisdom, but on God’s power.

Context

            Paul is writing this letter to the church in Corinth to address some sort of division in the local church there (I know you’re shocked that there could be division in a church!). It appears that the division centers around whose teachings are the best to follow. In other words, the church was picking sides and Paul is reminding them that all believers are one body and followers of Christ and Christ’s teachings alone since Christ is the one who died on the cross and into whose name we have been baptized. Paul is insisting that superior human intelligence and wisdom cannot elevate one believer over another if Christ is the center and focus of our faith. “In order to preserve the threatened unity of the church, Paul established that the formation of inner-church groupings had no basis in his ministry as founder of the church nor in the gospel as such. He had baptized only a few of the Corinthians, and his teaching was not worldly wisdom teaching where one teacher may be superior to the other. On the contrary, he had promulgated the gospel—proclaimed by himself and his fellow apostles who were nothing but servants of Christ responsible to God.”[3] Paul goes on to teach in our subject verses that wisdom and intelligence, if anything, is an obstacle to believing. That’s not to say that smart and wise people can’t and don’t become believers but they do so not because of their superior intelligence but in-spite of it.

Text Analysis

            As usual, Paul pulls no punches in v. 18 as he makes clear that the cross is only foolish for those who are perishing. Some believers read with satisfaction that they are not included among those who are “perishing.” But these are dire words indeed. Note that Paul makes no specific distinction of those who are included within the definition of those who are perishing. It isn’t a matter of intelligence, wealth, beauty, age, race, gender, or anything else. It is a matter of whether one accepts, as true, Christ’s atonement for our sins through his death on the cross. The cross is the great equalizer for all humanity. “From the standpoint of his new position in Christ, Paul with this sentence sets forth the two basic groups of humankind. Formerly, as a Jew, it was Jew and Gentile (just as for the Greco-Roman it was Greek/Roman and barbarian). Now it is ‘us who are being saved’ and ‘those who are perishing.’ The former groups, Jew and Gentile, continue to exist (indeed, in v. 22 they will serve as representatives for the tow most common human ‘idolatries’), but apart from Christ they now both belong to the ‘perishing.’”[4]

            In v. 19, Paul draws on the words of Isaiah (Isa 29:14) to demonstrate that God’s ways are not like the ways of the world. The Greek word for “frustrate” can also be translated as “reject, ignore, invalidate or set aside.” How often do we think we know what is right or better even though God says just the opposite? Whether it’s in the area of money, sex or power, we deceive ourselves into thinking that we know that our way must be better than God’s way. Ultimately, that leads to the belief that God is irrelevant. Therefore, it’s up to us to live life according to what we think is best. We do the best we can and try to be the best person we can be and either don’t think about what happens at the end of life or hope we’ve been good enough to make God happy. It is humanity’s sinful condition that believes we’re smarter, wiser or stronger than God but “In its original context this passage belongs to that grand series of text that regularly warn Israel, or someone in Israel, not to try to match wits with God (cf. Isa 40:12-14, 25; Job 38-42). Yet it is the folly of our human machinations that we think we can outwit God, or that lets us think that God ought to be at least as smart as we are. Paul sees this Isaiah passage as now having eschatological fulfillment. In the cross, the promised ‘great reversal’ has been played out before human eyes in its ultimate way.”[5] Paul continues his point in v. 20 by highlighting those who are highly esteemed in virtually every society: The wise, philosophers and scholars. Paul is not disparaging wisdom and intelligence generally, this is clear when he uses the qualifying statement “of this age” which is elsewhere translated “of this world.” Instead, Paul calls into question worldly wisdom “To say what is left of a human wisdom which God’s saving acts have left high and dry in the light of the cross. The cross places giving, receiving, and serving above achieving or ‘finding the right formula.’”[6] Paul makes a subtle but important point in v. 21 when he says that God in his wisdom knew that the world in its wisdom would not believe in him. Yet God used what the world considered foolish, Christ’s sacrifice on the cross, to save those the world did not consider wise. It is really brilliant when you stop and think of it; those of us who may not be considered very wise or intelligent are saved because we believe the very thing that makes us foolish in the eyes of a world that considers itself to be wise and intelligent for not believing. And to top it off, that’s exactly the way God planned it!

            In vv. 22-23 Paul explains that the Jews want proof and the Greeks want rational comprehension. But all the Church has to offer is that God incarnate in Christ was crucified for our sins. The Jews cannot possibly accept that the Rock of Ages would sacrifice himself for his creation. Therefore Christ becomes the capstone the builders reject and the stone that causes people to stumble (1 Peter 2:7-8). Instead, the “Jews viewed the crucifixion as the ultimate proof that Jesus had been cursed by God for some sin of his own.”[7] For the Greeks, who prized rational thought and clever rhetoric, the message of the cross was unintelligent. “Many Greeks found numerous aspects of the story of Christ’s death foolish—a suffering God, the ideal of perfect order destroyed, a criminal Messiah, and a way to God not based on human speculation.”[8] Is this really very different from today? Those who refuse to believe at once demand proof of Jesus’ claims while at the same time refusing to believe that God could become a man, offer himself to die a gruesome death on the cross and then rise back to life after three days in the grave.

            In contrast to all those who can’t or won’t believe are those who do believe because God has called them to belief. Paul makes clear in v. 24 that God has called both Jew and Greek. Paul’s identification of Jew and Greek is not intended to establish a limitation but to illustrate the two extremes intended to include all those who fall within the extremes. Those who accept God’s call to believe find that,

“The cross of Christ constitutes precisely the mode of action which conveys God’s power and God’s wisdom. It does not rest on human calculations about signs of the times, nor upon manipulative devices which entice belief, nor does it rest on self-defeating strategies to master life by techniques of human wisdom. God’s manifestation of power and wisdom operates on a different basis, namely, the way of love which accepts the constraints imposed by the human condition or plight and the prior divine act of promise, and becomes effectual and operative (has power) in God’s own way, for it corresponds with God’s own nature as revealed in Christ and in the cross. Any version of the gospel which substitutes a message of personal success for the cross is a manipulative counterfeit.”[9]

Finally Paul reminds us in v. 25 that our wisdom is hardly comparable to the wisdom of God and any weakness of God is still stronger than any person’s strength. “In the cross God ‘outsmarted’ his human creatures and thereby nullified their wisdom. In the same cross God also ‘overpowered’ his enemies, with lavish grace and forgiveness, and thereby divested them of their strength…Had God consulted us for wisdom we could have given him a more workable plan, something that would attract the sign-seeker and the lover of wisdom. As it is, in his own wisdom he left us out of the consultation. We are this left with the awful risk: trust God and be saved by his wise folly, or keep up our pretensions and perish.”[10]

Paul reminds his readers in vv. 26-29 that when they were first called by God to believe, the world probably didn’t consider them wise. Furthermore, they weren’t socially or politically influential either positionally or by birth. In fact, being affiliated with Christ and the cross made then appear foolish in the eyes of the world. But it is precisely these “foolish” ones that God uses to shame the wise; those who are the lowest, those who are the weakest and those who are despised to shame those who are strong and highly esteemed by society. God uses what has been discarded by the world to shame the world. Sometimes it doesn’t seem to make sense to us because the wise, intelligent, prominent, popular and strong have a louder voice in society and could advance the gospel so much more effectively given the fact that when they talk, the world seems to listen. But that’s precisely the problem as far as Paul’s concerned. A wise person boasts in their wisdom, a strong person in their strength, a smart person in their intelligence and a powerful person in their influence. But those who are despised, broken and weak can only rely on God and as a result can boast only in what God has done for them and in them.

Paul tells them in vv. 30-31 that it is because of God’s wisdom that Christ came to us. And by extension, Christ and everything he represents for us; righteousness, holiness and redemption, is now God’s wisdom in our lives. Consequently, everything about our lives must be Christ-centered because everything we have comes from God through Christ. Paul calls on the words of the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 9:24) at the end of the chapter imploring those who boast about anything should boast only in the Lord who has called them to faith in the great reversal that shows worldly wisdom, strength and influence to be shameful in light of the what God has done in and through the foolish, weak and despised.

Paul picks up in vv. 1-2 of chapter two right where he left of at the end of chapter one when he claims to have come to them originally without fancy words or intellectual arguments about God. Instead, Paul was determined to keep his testimony simple and two the point: Christ and the cross. “Paul does not deny that he tried to present his message in as compelling a form as possible, merely that by the world’s standards he was at best ordinary.”[11] Paul’s comment that he came to the Corinthians originally in weakness, fear and trembling, is difficult to understand because we don’t really know the context of Paul’s weakness. Many believe that it is a reference to some sort of illness since some of his other letters reference “my illness” (Gal 4:14) in one case and “severe suffering” (1 Thess 1:5-6) in another. Nevertheless, Paul uses his “weakness” as an advantage to demonstrate the power of God’s message even in, or perhaps especially in, weakness. Paul’s sense of “fear and trembling” in v. 3 is not based in the receptivity of his audience but in the gravity of the message. “Paul is precisely not a visiting orator come to entertain the crowds as an audience-pleasing performer.”[12] Instead, Paul makes it clear in vv. 4-5 that even though his words may have not been wise or persuasive as defined by the world, they were, nevertheless, laden with the power of the Holy Spirit. Consequently, their faith was not rooted in the wisdom or words of Paul but in the power of God alone. Paul “Deliberately avoided the very thing that now fascinated them, ‘the persuasion of wisdom.’ But his preaching did not thereby lack ‘persuasion.’ What it lacked was the kind of persuasion found among the sophists and rhetoricians, where the power lay in the person and his delivery. Paul’s preaching, on the other hand, despite his personal appearance and whatever its actual form, produced the desired results, namely it brought about the faith of the Corinthians.”[13]

Application

            This ministry has put me right in the line of fire for those “smart” and “wise” people who think I’m “diluted, deceived, unintelligent and irrational” just to point out a few of the more civilized ways some readers have characterized me. But I’m pretty sure that I’m none of those things. Nevertheless, standing up for the truth of the Gospel seems terribly difficult at times. Not because it’s hard to defend but because most of us are the foolish, weak and despised and don’t have much of a voice in the world. We’re not like Einstein who says belief in God is “childish” and an illustration of “human weakness” and because he’s a genius, people automatically think he must be right. But that’s the beauty of God’s wisdom! We don’t need to match wits with the Einsteins of the world. We can put them all to shame with the message of salvation represented by our lives. We each have a salvation “story” that demonstrates, first, God’s mercy but also God’s power to transform lives. If you are a believer, think about your “story” against the backdrop of Einstein’s words. You substance abusers or addicts of any kind who have kicked the habit; is that weakness? You women who have been abused and/or raped yet have forgiven those who have harmed you; is that weakness? You single people who remain sexually pure until your wedding while fighting a world constantly trying to entice you to compromise; is that weakness? You who have forgiven your spouse who has been unfaithful to you; is that weakness? You who have given your lives in service to those who are lost, broken, hungry or in prison; is that childish? Don’t be intimidated by a world that prizes intelligence, power, influence and outward beauty. You have all you need because of what God has done for you and in you through Christ. Remember The Foolishness of the Cross will never make sense to those who are perishing!


[1] “Einstein ‘God’ letter to sell on eBay, with bidding starting at $3M,” http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/04/einstein-god-letter-on-ebay-with-bidding-starting-at-3m/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fmost-popular+(Internal+-+Most+Popular+Content), (Accessed October 4, 2012).
[2] “Principles of Scientific Inquiry,” http://www.mc3edsupport.org/community/knowledgebases/principles-of-scientific-inquiry-64.html, (Accessed October 5, 2012).
[3] Gerald F. Hawethorne, Ralph P. Martin, Daniel G. Reid, eds., Dictionary of Paul and his Letters, (Downers Grove, IL: InverVarsity Press, 1993), p. 969.
[4] Gordon D. Fee, NICNT, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1987), pp. 68-69.
[5] Ibid., p. 70.
[6] Anthony C. Thiselton, NIGTC, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2000), p. 162.
[7] Craig Blomberg, The NIV Application Commentary, 1 Corinthians, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1994), p. 53.
[8] Ibid.
[9] Thiselton, NIGTC, p. 172.
[10] Fee, NICNT, p. 77.
[11] Blomberg, NIV, 1 Corinthians, p. 54.
[12] Thiselton, NIGTC, First Corinthians, p. 213.
[13] Fee, NICNT, First Corinthians, p. 94.