Wednesday, April 8, 2015

He Is Risen!


(Audio version; Music included--"Here" by: Jobe/Leonard/Jordan--"From The Inside Out" by: Houston--WorshipMob and "Touch The Sky" by: Hillsong UNITED)











Introduction

            I don’t know about you but I tend to get worn down by the news. I try not to pay too much attention except where events might affect my family and my brothers and sisters in Christ around the world. It might just be my imagination but it certainly seems like it is open season on Christians everywhere around the world. Thankfully, the worst that Christians here in America have to endure is the overt hatred from unbelievers expressed in words. Occasionally, militant atheists are successful in having some reference to God removed from a public structure or have a cross removed from some public property. Recently, the homosexual community has managed to destroy some Christian business owners who refused to endorse or participate in their same-sex marriage ceremonies. However, for the time being, Christians here in America aren’t in any imminent physical danger. Unfortunately, that’s not the case for Christians in countries controlled by communists and it’s especially not the case in countries controlled by Muslims. In those places, Christians are very much in danger of prison and their very lives all for their belief in Jesus Christ. It seems, however, in recent weeks that the hatred and abuse toward Christians has reached a fevered pitch. I can see it in the hateful comments I receive on a weekly basis and I read it in the almost daily accounts of Christians kidnapped, tortured, and murdered by Muslims around the world. I’ve spent a number of hours this week praying for the persecuted Church around the world and I was reminded of something I said in last week’s lesson about converting to Christianity. Let me repeat it here because I think it explains why the hatred toward Christians seems to have grown in recent months. I wrote: “Conversion involves a change of lords. The one who until then has been under the lordship of Satan comes under the lordship of God, and comes out of darkness into light.”[1] That explains much as far as I’m concerned in light of the Resurrection Day we just finished celebrating—there are still so many who are under the lordship of Satan. You see, there is no middle ground for humanity; no neutral existence. Humanity is either under the lordship of Christ by conscious choice or under the lordship of Satan by default.

            For Christians, Resurrection Day, or Easter, is a reminder of the steep price of humanity’s sins. It is a reminder of God’s fierce love for us and how far God is willing to go to make it possible for us to spend eternity with Him. However, Resurrection Day is also a reminder to Satan that he has been defeated and he is still ferociously angry about that. So much so that Peter says the enemy, Satan, prowls the earth like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour (1 Pet 5:8). And Satan uses all those who are under his lordship to carry out his evil schemes against Christians whether they are conscious of Satan’s power in their lives or not. You can see Satan’s handiwork on display at the cross. He used Judas and the religious leaders to try and destroy Jesus and what might have been. When Jesus died on that cross, I’m guessing Satan and his henchmen were celebrating. You can see the celebration in the mocking words of the religious leaders, the Roman soldiers and even one of the two men crucified along with Jesus. Satan’s victory celebration began in earnest when Jesus’ dead body was taken down from the cross, placed in stone tomb, and sealed by a large stone guarded by Roman soldiers. Satan, however, made one miscalculation in his plan—death had no control over the Author of life. And when Jesus walked out of that grave after three days. Satan’s celebration came to an abrupt end and instead the empty tomb was the official notice to Satan that he has been defeated. Nevertheless, Satan will not go quietly and the Resurrection Day is a constant reminder to him that he lost. And I’m guessing that nothing infuriates him more than hearing the three words that have set Christians free, He Is Risen!

Subject Text

Luke 24:1-12

1On the first day of the week, very early in the morning, the women took the spices they had prepared and went to the tomb. 2They found the stone rolled away from the tomb, 3but when they entered, they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus. 4While they were wondering about this, suddenly two men in clothes that gleamed like lightning stood beside them. 5In their fright the women bowed down with their faces to the ground, but the men said to them, “Why do you look for the living among the dead? 6He is not here; he has risen! Remember how he told you, while he was still with you in Galilee: 7‘The Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, be crucified and on the third day be raised again.’” 8Then they remembered his words. 9When they came back from the tomb, they told all these things to the Eleven and to all the others. 10It was Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and the others with them who told this to the apostles. 11But they did not believe the women, because their words seemed to them like nonsense. 12Peter, however, got up and ran to the tomb. Bending over, he saw the strips of linen lying by themselves, and he went away, wondering to himself what had happened.

 Context

            The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke share more in common in their respective biographies of Jesus than does John’s Gospel. They were certainly all accurate, they just each had a different theological prism through which they saw Jesus, His mission, and His ministry. I chose Luke for two reasons. First, Luke wasn’t one of Jesus’ disciples. I know that sounds strange but Luke had a specific purpose in writing his Gospel and you can find it right at the beginning. He was writing as a kind of first century investigative reporter when he wrote:

1Many have undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, 2just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were eyewitnesses and servants of the word. 3Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught (Lk 1:1-4).”

            Luke, perhaps more than the other Gospel writers, was an objective observer. He saw things for the way they were, not the way he wanted them to be. Unlike the other Gospel writers, Luke hadn’t invested three and a half years of his life following Jesus around from town to town. Luke was an outsider who was only interested in the facts.

            The other reason I chose Luke is because he was a physician so I believe his account of Jesus’ torture, death, and resurrection must be considered very carefully. In a largely agrarian culture, Luke’s specialty was medicine so he necessarily perceived the events of the resurrection through the eyes of a doctor. Let me try to explain what I mean. If you are a dentist, what do you notice when you talk to someone? Probably their teeth—especially if they are especially bad or especially beautiful. If you are an automobile mechanic, what do you notice when you see a car or listen to its engine running? Probably whether or not it is mechanically sound. If you are a carpenter, what do you see when you look at a “fine” piece of furniture? Probably whether or not it is the product of an experienced craftsman or the product of mass production. If you are an artist, what do you see when you look at a piece of artwork? You can probably see immediately whether it is an inspired work that should hang on the walls of The Louvre or a paint-by-the-numbers work that should hang on the front of someone’s refrigerator with refrigerator magnets. In this way, Luke sees the events of our Subject Text through the eyes of a physician. He has investigated all the events of Jesus’ life and ministry and all the events that led up to his crucifixion, all from the perspective of a physician. Luke’s Gospel is the most comprehensive of the four biographies of Jesus. The diction and vocabulary clearly show the work of an educated man. Furthermore, Luke’s frequent inclusion of illnesses and diagnoses betray his experience and perspective as a physician.

Consequently, Luke understood, perhaps better than most, what happened to the human body when it experienced the physical trauma experienced by Jesus—it would die. Which is exactly what happened to Jesus. To this point, everything that happened to Jesus is probably not a surprise to Luke—a man nearly beaten to death, then nailed to a cross would naturally die. It would also be no surprise to Luke that Jesus would be taken down from the cross and be laid in a tomb. However, there is no way Luke would be prepared for what happened three days later. When people said Jesus rose from the dead, any respectable doctor would have approached that claim with understandable skepticism. So after a thorough investigation of all the evidence, including the eyewitness testimony (remember that the Book of Acts that records all the eyewitness testimony was also written by Luke), what was Luke’s conclusion with respect to Jesus’ death? He Is Risen!

Text Analysis

1On the first day of the week, very early in the morning, the women took the spices they had prepared and went to the tomb.

            Jesus was taken down and placed in the tomb on Friday night before the Sabbath. Everyone who participated in removing Jesus from the cross and laying His body in the tomb, went home and kept the Sabbath as required by the Law. Jesus died on Friday—that was the first day. Jesus was still in the tomb on Saturday, the Sabbath—that was the second day.  On Sunday morning—that was the third day, according to v. 1, the women who witnessed Jesus’ death, brought spices to the tomb to honor and prepare Jesus’ body. It might seem like an odd practice but the women were showing their love for Jesus. It is much like our practice of bringing flowers to a funeral. “At the burial of Jesus, Nicodemus brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes weighing a hundred pounds. The large amount was probably an expression of honour…The practice was followed of laying the spices between the clothes in which the body was wrapped.”[2]

All of the Gospels make it a point that it was women who are the first to go to Jesus’ tomb on Sunday morning. In a largely patriarchal culture, this reality is particularly important for a number of reasons. First it lends to the credibility of the Gospel record. If the writers had ulterior motives, they probably would have had men finding the empty tomb because the witness of a woman in first century Jerusalem was largely disregarded as unreliable and untrustworthy. However, “Jesus’ gift and call to divine sonship were intended for the poor and the lost and in a special way for women upon whom he conferred a new dignity…We do not find women disciples in the circle of the Twelve. But this may well be due to the Twelve being chosen as the counterpart to the twelve sons of Jacob as heads to the twelve tribes [of Israel]. However, women were to be found among the followers of Jesus; they were more prominent than the men in their love, care and courage after the crucifixion.”[3]

2They found the stone rolled away from the tomb, 3but when they entered, they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus.

            You can almost imagine the grief-stricken women slowly making their way to the tomb early in the morning. The weight of the death of the One they loved must have felt like they were being crushed as the walked. No doubt the trek to the tomb was not filled with joy. Instead, each step brought them one step closer to realizing that Jesus’ death wasn’t just some bad dream from which they would awaken to find Jesus still alive and well. What do you suppose began to race through their minds when the tomb came into view in vv. 2-3 and they could see that the stone that sealed the tomb had been rolled away? I wonder if they stopped for a moment to make sure they were going to the right tomb. Why would the stone have been rolled away? Who would do such a thing? The Jews couldn’t have done it because they were all bound by the laws governing the Sabbath day of rest like the women had been. Why would the Romans move the stone? Where are the soldiers who were guarding the tomb? Where is everyone? What’s going on? I wonder if their pace didn’t pick up and perhaps they even began to run to the tomb. They expected to find a sealed tomb and the dead, cold body of Jesus—they found neither. Instead, the stone sealing the tomb had been rolled away and Jesus’ body was gone. The tragic events of the last few days must have felt like being in the middle of a raging storm. Bruised and battered by the storm with emotions already raw, the women must now endure one more brutal reality—Jesus’ body is gone! “Luke was careful to note that the women ‘saw the tomb and how his body was laid,’ with the result that, as they now return to the tomb, they can hardly expect anything other than an undisturbed corpse. In this way, he preserves the element of astonishment when the body is found missing. Indeed, this point of the account is heightened by the double use of the verb ‘to find’: they found the stone rolled away from the tomb, but did not find the corpse. Who are these women? How was the stone removed? Luke’s account neglects such detail, for he wants to move quickly to the pivotal discovery of an empty tomb.”[4]

4While they were wondering about this, suddenly two men in clothes that gleamed like lightning stood beside them.

            The text calls them “men” but their description tells us they are angels. What’s the first thing you think of when you hear or see these words in v. 4? I don’t know about you but I often wonder why? Why did God do it this way? It seems almost unbelievable that two angels would suddenly appear in the tomb with the women. Indeed it seems strange to us, but we’ve all experienced Jesus differently than did those who followed Him from town to town and ate with Him and sat at His feet while He taught and then subsequently saw Him die on a cross and placed in a tomb. Again, we know the events like a story that has a beginning, middle, and an end. We know the script, the players, and the various scenes. The disciples, including these women, were living the story. Yes they were players but there was no script and the scenes were unknown to them yet unfolding with them in the scenes. How would things have been different if one or two of the regular towns-people walked into the tomb while they were there? Wouldn’t there immediately be some suspicion that something nefarious had happened to Jesus. However, when angels appear, there is suddenly no question about what they have to say. That there are two angels is perhaps a Deuteronomical fulfillment that required two witnesses for a valid testimony. Their message is automatically given the benefit of being true. There was no time to waste trying to wade through human communication and motives to determine if they were true and noble or whether they were filled with lies and or maybe even with the intent of drawing out those who were Jesus’ followers so that they too could be eliminated. The appearance of angels cuts through all that and gets straight to the point—Where was Jesus’ body?

5In their fright the women bowed down with their faces to the ground, but the men said to them, “Why do you look for the living among the dead? 6He is not here; he has risen! Remember how he told you, while he was still with you in Galilee: 7‘The Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, be crucified and on the third day be raised again.’” 8Then they remembered his words.

            Again, don’t read your understanding of the events of this day into the lives of these women. You know the story from vv. 5-8 but they don’t appear to. Or do they? According to the two angels, they do know the story. In fact, they know the story because Jesus told them. He told them exactly what would take place. You know what, I know exactly what this is like. During the many storms of my life, I forget about the things Jesus said; I forget Jesus’ promises that He is always present in my life—that He will never leave me or forsake me even if I forget sometimes. Sometimes I need a reminder. I’d say that God hasn’t sent me angels to remind me of His promises, but I have two beautiful daughters and every time I think of them, I remember. God does whatever it takes to get through to us; to reach us; to remind us of what He has said and done and promised. For these women, God sent two angels to remind them. “At this critical point in the gospel story angels intervene, bringing divine revelation and encouraging and instructing Jesus’ followers. Similarly, angels were integral to the events surrounding the Savior’s birth. We might best understand the mediation of angels at both his birth and resurrection as marking the unique meeting of heaven and earth in these events.”[5]

9When they came back from the tomb, they told all these things to the Eleven and to all the others. 10It was Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and the others with them who told this to the apostles. 11But they did not believe the women, because their words seemed to them like nonsense.

            I imagine the women who found the empty tomb did the same thing any of us would have done—they ran back and told the other disciples, most of whom had been hiding out since the night Jesus was arrested. According to vv. 9-11, the women experienced from the disciples what many of us experience when we try to share Jesus with the people in our lives—they didn’t believe them. I suppose, at least for the moment, that you can’t blame the disciples. Remember, like the women who found the empty tomb the disciples don’t have a script; they don’t know the scenes, the story is unfolding with them right in the middle of it. We can’t just assume that the disciples would know just because we know. I know they spent nearly every day for three and a half years with Jesus which we did not have the benefit of doing. But the disciples also witnessed (perhaps not as eyewitnesses) His death, which we were spared from witnessing. We take the events that unfolded with respect to Jesus’ resurrection on faith but the disciples didn’t have the benefit of our hindsight so they were naturally skeptical. Not because the witness of women wasn’t accepted but because what the said didn’t make sense to them—it “seemed to them like nonsense.” Some of you know exactly what this is like. There isn’t a week that goes by when some unbeliever calls me an ignorant fool who believes in fairytales. No matter how I try and explain the Gospel they reject it because it “seemed to them like nonsense.” However, the disciples weren’t unbelievers, they were “couldn’t-believers.”

The disciples believed in Jesus until He no longer fit into their theological box and then they became “couldn’t-believers.” They couldn’t believe that the Messiah was arrested. They couldn’t believe that Jesus was nailed to a cross. They couldn’t believe the Messiah died. They couldn’t believe the tomb was empty. And now they couldn’t believe that two angels appeared to the women from their group and told them that Jesus rose from the dead. The disciples believed who they thought Jesus was but for the moment they couldn’t believe who He really was. For now, the disciples were “couldn’t-believers.” “Apparently Jesus’ words about dying and rising again had gone past all of them. Many skeptics have tried to write off the Resurrection as a story made up by a group of overzealous disciples. But here the opposite occurred. The disciples were not anxiously looking for any reason to believe that Jesus had risen; in fact, they were not anticipating it. When told of the Resurrection, they refused to believe without concrete evidence. Even a missing body was not enough to convince them.”[6]

12Peter, however, got up and ran to the tomb. Bending over, he saw the strips of linen lying by themselves, and he went away, wondering to himself what had happened.

            Say what you want about Peter, he was never one to follow the crowd. While the rest of the disciples were “couldn’t-believers.” Peter was a “maybe-believer.” You know this person don’t you? You’ve shared the message of Jesus with them and they haven’t accepted or rejected what you’ve said. They’ve listened and they are weighing the possibility that you could be right. They are “maybe-believers.” Peter didn’t know anything about Jesus that the rest of them didn’t know. Sure, not all the disciples were present when Jesus was transfigured, but James and John were there and Luke doesn’t say that they went with Peter in v. 12. So why Peter? The text doesn’t tell us but Peter had a particularly ignominious relationship Jesus. Peter was the one who denied Jesus three times. It is true that all the disciples deserted Jesus when He was arrested but Peter went one step farther and actually denied knowing Jesus. So put yourself in Peter’s place. You vowed your allegiance and devotion to Jesus; You made a confession right to His face in the presence of the other disciples that you believed He was the Christ—the Chosen One. And then when Jesus perhaps needed a friend to encourage Him or maybe try to defend Him, you denied knowing Him. Now imagine He was convicted by false testimony and then put to death all while you stood by and watched and did absolutely nothing. How do you suppose you would be feeling? You didn’t have a chance to apologize. You didn’t have a chance for a second chance before Jesus was put to death. I wonder, what would you give for a do-over? What do you suppose Peter would have given for a do-over? If I had to bet, I’d bet Peter saw his chance at a do-over when he heard about the empty tomb so he went running to see for himself. “Denying Peter was also impulsive, inquisitive Peter. The women’s story pricked his conscience and challenged him to take a look for himself. Here the open tomb is taken for granted in the narrative. Peter easily entered the tomb. His response to such easy access was not recorded. The two “men” did not appear to Peter. All the evidence he had to go on were the cloths that had wrapped Jesus’ body. They set him wondering. No one would remove the wrappings and then steal the body. Only a person needing to walk away would remove the cloths. Could the women’s story be true?”[7] Peter had become a “maybe-believer.”

Application

            It can be hard losing someone you love. There is a grief beyond explanation. I know this grief very well when I suddenly lost my best friend, Dave, unexpectedly. I have a picture of the two of us in my office when our families vacationed together. When I started to sense that God was calling me to ministry, I asked Dave to pray for me. He was the first person to tell me that he believed that I would make a great pastor one day. I don’t know about being a great pastor but he never even got the chance to see me become a pastor. It’s been thirteen years since he died and it still hurts. I can still hear his wife wailing the news of his death at me over the phone. I can still hear my wife scream when I called her and gave her the news. I remember so many awful things surrounding the days following his death that I wish I could forget. But as hard as it’s been, there is something that I take comfort in—Dave and I believed in the same Jesus; we believed in the resurrection; we knew that this life wasn’t the end. Because Jesus walked out of the tomb, I know that I will one day see my friend, Dave, again. The resurrection of Jesus was also about hope; hope that like Jesus, all believers will one day be resurrected to a new life; an eternal life in the presence of Jesus. Author and speaker, Patsy Clairmont tells the story of some of her friends, the Porter family, that illustrates how the grief surrounding the loss of a loved-one turns to hope; hope because Jesus has overcome death. Here’s what she writes:

            “We buried my friend’s 26-year-old son last week. An accidental gunshot took Jeff’s life. We have more questions than answers. We are offended at people who have all the answers and no experience with devastating loss.

            “I watched the heart-wrenching scenes as the family tried to come to grips with their tragedy. I can still hear the travailing of the mother’s anguished heart. I can still see the wrenching of the father’s grief-worn hands. I can still feel the distraught sobs that racked the sister’s body as I held her. I can still smell the hospital and the funeral home. Memories march before my mind like soldiers, causing me to relive the agony. If it is this difficult for me, Jeff’s godmother, how much more magnified it must be for his birth mother! I can’t imagine.

            “As I watched Jeff’s mom, Carol, the week after his death, I observed a miracle. I saw her move from despair to hope. From franticness to peace. From uncertainty to assurance. From needing comfort to extending it.

            “I witnessed a mom face her worst nightmare and refuse to run away. Instead, she ran to Him. When grief knocked the breath out of Carol, she went to the Breath Giver. I watched as the Lord placed His mantle of grace around her and then supported her with His mercy. The grief process has just begun for Jeff’s loved ones. The Lord will not remove His presence from the Porter family. But there may be moments when He will remove their awareness of His presence. That will allow them to feel the impact of the loss. For He knows it would be our tendency to hide even behind His grace to protect our fragile hearts from the harsh winds of reality. He offers us refuge, but He also promises us wholeness. Wholeness means we are fully present with ourselves and with Him. Therefore, we have to own our pain. If we do not, part of who we are we must either shut down, avoid, or deny. That would leave us estranged from ourselves and divided from our identity. Also, we would never heal in a way that would allow us to minister to others.”[8]

            “The death of Jesus Christ left his followers devastated with grief similar to the Porter Family’s. They had lost their friend, their leader, and their life’s goals, hopes, and dreams. All meaning had disappeared from life. Meeting the resurrected Christ gave them the assurance and power they needed to recover from their grief realistically, regain their wholeness, and renew their commitment to the goal Christ set before them. We have trouble feeling the same grief and loss the disciples felt at Jesus’ death, but we can feel the glory of his resurrection and the joy of being part of his goal for living and for dying.”[9]

            Satan must have thought he finally figured out how he would be able to thwart God’s plan to make it possible for humanity to be reconciled to God. Satan was probably pretty smug when he saw Jesus nailed to the cross and he probably felt that he had everything wrapped up when they laid Jesus in the tomb. But the tomb wouldn’t be the end. In fact, there is no end when it comes to Jesus and life. When Jesus walked out of that tomb three days later, Satan was defeated and believers in every age since have an opportunity at a second chance; an opportunity at a do-over to be in relationship with God through Jesus. If you are a believer, you know what that feels like. Some of you remember the day your life went from unbelief to belief; from despair to hope; from grief to joy. You remember how things changed in your life when you went from being an unbeliever, to being a couldn’t-believer, to being a maybe-believer, and finally to becoming a believer. All because you finally believed those three words, He Is Risen!







[1] Colin Brown, gen. ed., New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Vol. 1, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1986), p. 355.
[2] Colin Brown, gen. ed., New International Dictionary of the New Testament, Vol. 2, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1986), p. 295.
[3] Colin Brown, gen. ed., New International Dictionary of the New Testament, Vol. 3, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1986), p. 1059.
[4] Joel B. Green, The Gospel of Luke—The New International Commentary on the New Testament, (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1997), p. 837.
[5] Joel B. Green, Scot McKnight, I. Howard Marshal, Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1992), p. 10.
[6] Bruce Barton, Philip Comfort, Grant Osborne, Linda K. Taylor, and Dave Veerman, Life Application New Testament Commentary, (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2001), p. 359.
[7] Trent C. Butler, Luke—Holman New Testament Commentary, (Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, 2000), pp. 415-416.
[8] Patsy Clairmont, Under His Wings, (Colorado Springs, CO: Focus on the Family, 1994), p.139ff.
[9] Butler, Luke, pp. 413-414.

No comments:

Post a Comment