Wednesday, February 26, 2014

When God's Plan Doesn't Make Sense


(Audio Version)

Introduction

            If you’re like me, you’ve seen the images of the protests in Ukraine over the last few weeks. I’m not qualified or smart enough to comment on the merits of the protests but I can’t seem to get some of the images out of my head. Specifically poignant are the images of religious leaders standing between protesters and riot police seeking a peaceful end to the violent protests. I was compelled to pray for all those affected by the riots as God reminded me of the many people from Ukraine that access my lessons every week. There are images of Ukranians kneeling in the streets praying at the feet of marching riot police and religious
leaders performing last rites over the dead bodies of those killed in the riots. The images are indeed stark—Christians in prayer with violence and death all around them. It can make a person wonder if God really is in control. It got me to thinking about the people in all the other countries who faithfully read my lessons on a weekly basis; places where Christians are killed daily for their faith; places where Christians languish in prisons for their faith; places where Christians break the law when they access my lessons because Christianity is illegal in their country. These people are our brothers and sisters in Christ! We are all bound together in Christ as members of His Church. Yet some of us are able to practice our faith with relatively little opposition while others risk their lives daily because of their faith—it can be hard to understand at times; it can be difficult to understand how God might be acting in or through any of these tragic events. Why do Christians around the world have to endure such painful, and at times, horrible trials? It’s a difficult question. Nevertheless, difficult trials are not isolated to the international community of believers, they occur daily in the lives of believers right here at home. A family member dies suddenly; a wife is diagnosed with cancer; a child relapses once again into drug abuse; a father walks out on his children; a marriage comes to a painful end. Believers have the benefit of looking to God for hope and comfort. However, as beings created in the image of God, we’re not necessarily suited to follow along like mindless robots. Even though we readily acknowledge God’s wisdom and sovereignty with respect to the affairs of His creation, when the pain in our lives reaches a certain point, we can’t help but question what God is doing in, through or around us. When we read the Bible we see that the entire story of God has a specific trajectory; history is moving in a specific direction and that direction is being guided by God. Most of us, when life is going smoothly, are ready to admit that God has a great and glorious plan. But when life falls apart, we begin to question that plan. What do we do? Where do we turn When God’s Plan Doesn’t Make Sense?

Subject Text

Habakkuk 1:2-17
            2How long, O LORD, must I call for help, but you do not listen? Or cry out to you, “Violence!” but you do not save? 3Why do you make me look at injustice? Why do you tolerate wrong? Destruction and violence are before me; there is strife, and conflict abounds. 4Therefore the law is paralyzed, and justice never prevails. The wicked hem in the righteous, so that justice is perverted. 5“Look at the nations and watch—and be utterly amazed. For I am going to do something in your days that you would not believe, even if you were told. 6I am raising up the Babylonians, that ruthless and impetuous people, who sweep across the whole earth to seize dwelling places not their own. 7They are a feared and dreaded people; they are a law to themselves and promote their own honor. 8Their horses are swifter than leopards, fiercer than wolves at dusk. Their cavalry gallops headlong; their horsemen come from afar. They fly like a vulture swooping to devour; 9they all come bent on violence. Their hordes advance like a desert wind and gather prisoners like sand. 10They deride kings and scoff at rulers. They laugh at all fortified cities; they build earthen ramps and capture them. 11Then they sweep past like the wind and go on—guilty men, whose own strength is their god.12O LORD, are you not from everlasting? My God, my Holy One, we will not die. O LORD, you have appointed them to execute judgment; O Rock, you have ordained them to punish. 13Your eyes are too pure to look on evil; you cannot tolerate wrong. Why then do you tolerate the treacherous? Why are you silent while the wicked swallow up those more righteous than themselves? 14You have made men like fish in the sea, like sea creatures that have no ruler. 15The wicked foe pulls all of them up with hooks, he catches them in his net, he gathers them up in his dragnet; and so he rejoices and is glad. 16Therefore he sacrifices to his net and burns incense to his dragnet, for by his net he lives in luxury and enjoys the choicest food. 17Is he to keep on emptying his net, destroying nations without mercy?
Context

            Habakkuk lived and ministered during Israel’s divided kingdom. He prophesied from the southern kingdom of Judah sometime during the ten year period between 608 BC ad 598 BC. We often focus on the fall of Jerusalem in 586 BC and rightly so because the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar burned the Temple and every other significant building to the ground and carted off most of the remaining Jews back to Babylon as prisoners and slaves. However, nearly 20 years before that tragic event, around 605 BC, the Babylonians overran Judah. Israel’s history was familiar with war and the atrocities of war. However, they had never encountered a warring machine like the Babylonians. The Babylonians demoralized and crushed their opponents under a tidal wave of terror and brutality. The only thing that exceeded the tenacity of their warriors, whose relentless attack was like a storm that would never end, was the ferocity with which they fought. Few were able to hold off an attack from the Babylonians for any significant length of time. Eventually, their brutality proved to be no match for any kingdom that stood in the way of their insatiable desire to conquer the world. First Judah and then Israel where no match for the Babylonians. Yet God would use just this instrument of brutality to carry out his well designed plan to discipline the Jews for their continued disobedience.

Text Analysis

            Habakkuk’s plea in vv. 2-4 sounds familiar doesn’t it? Habakkuk was in the midst of a culture where God was once the center of the peoples’ focus and now they were behaving as though God was just a hobby that one could take or leave. Injustice, unnecessary suffering, destruction, violence, strife, and conflict were rampant among the people and no one seemed to be doing anything about it. To make matters worse, the verses imply that Habakkuk had been pleading with God for some time to intervene and set things right. Yet God remained silent—until now. My gosh, Habakkuk could have been talking about America! For decades, Christians have lamented the cultural drift in America. They’ve been pleading for renewal through God’s intervention to set things right. In a recent survey by LifeWay Research, 59% of Christians believe they are losing the culture war and 11% believe the war has already been lost. How can this be? In the midst of all the prayers for renewal and God’s divine intervention, things have only gotten worse! It doesn’t make sense. Well, it didn’t make sense to Habakkuk either. God insisted that His chosen people were to behave a certain way and if they didn’t, Habakkuk fully believed that God would do something about it. The only problem is that Habakkuk wanted God to intervene on his time-table and in the manner he thought would be best. Habakkuk grew impatient with God and he would soon find out what happens when God intervenes to set things right. “Habakkuk wonders how long he must wait for God’s help against violence. Judah’s problems with corruption are addressed in three matched pairs: injustice (Heb. ’āwen) and wrongful suffering (Heb. ‘āmāl); destruction (Heb. šōd) and violence (Heb. hāmās); strife (Heb. rîb) and conflict (Heb. mādôn). The latter two are legal terms marking the many lawsuits and legal quarrels in the courts. These six problems have four results, also presented in poetic pairs: the law is paralyzed, and justice never prevails; the wicked hem in the righteous so that justice is perverted. In a few words Habakkuk describes a ruined society full of crime, violence, corruption, mock legal battles and the defeat of the righteous, and he wants to know why God tolerates it.”[1]

            Have you ever heard the saying, ‘Be careful what you ask for?’ The implication of the saying is that you should be careful what you ask for because you may not like it when you get it. Well Habakkuk was about to have just such a moment when God tells him how He intends to intervene to set things right. God makes it clear in v. 5 that when He acts, there’s no mistaking it; God doesn’t dabble in fixes or nibble around the edges and this case was no different. The Jews would witness the great nation of Egypt crushed nearly overnight; the Assyrian capital of Nineveh would be so devastated that the people would actually forget where it was—it was essentially wiped off the map; and their own independent nation would become a land of slaves and servants all at the hands of the mighty and brutal Babylonians. I’m guessing Habakkuk’s head was swimming at the mere mention of the Babylonians in v. 6, and he probably had a hard time focusing on anything after that as God described the efficient brutality of the Babylonians in vv. 7-11. The Babylonians weren’t like the Jews who looked to God for provision and protection. The Babylonians relied on themselves for what they needed and they simply took whatever they wanted. Their military strength and prowess was their god. Nevertheless, “The Lord agrees with the prophetic indictment against the behavior of the covenant people. Violence prevails. Strife, contention, plundering, and perversion of justice permeate the nation…The Lord himself is fully in sympathy with the prophet’s agony over the suffering righteous ones. Although having larger concerns as well, the Lord knows and sympathizes with those who have been surrounded by the wicked. The stunning character of the Lord’s revelation relates to the awesomeness of the divine response that hovers on the horizon of history. When this coming reality is appreciated, it becomes plain that the Lord perceives the problem even more deeply than does the prophet. His resolution of the problem therefore appears overwhelming…It is indeed remarkable to note the explicitness of the announcement concerning the designated instrument of God’s judgment. The Lord’s control of the nations is so great that he orders their rise and fall according to his own plans and purposes. He may choose to disperse his people among the heathen as a way of claiming for himself a populace from all the nations. Yet this dispersion will occur in perfect coordination with the time in which his own people are ripe for judgment because of their persistence in rebellion over centuries.”[2]

            You can almost imagine Habakkuk backpedaling in vv. 12-17 saying, ‘Wait, wait, wait let’s think about this for a minute. How exactly will you deal with Israel’s evil ways by using the greatest and most brutal evil of our time to discipline them?’ Habakkuk wants to know how it could be possible for God to partner with the evil and treachery of the Babylonians. Habakkuk itemizes the unrighteousness of the Babylonians as though God is somehow unfamiliar with them. Does this sound familiar to you? When God’s Plan Doesn’t Make Sense, we try to explain the situation to God thinking he must be misinformed somehow. We seem to think that God somehow relies on us to keep Him not only informed on problems we face but to recommend appropriate solutions for Him to adopt and implement. We treat God like He’s some old man wringing His hands and pacing the floor because He’s run out of ideas on how to fix the problems of the world. However, nothing could be farther from the truth! God has foreseen all the events of the world long before they have occurred. As a result, His judgments and solutions are always timely and efficacious. “Habakkuk was well aware of Judah’s faults, but by any standards his countrymen, particularly the righteous nucleus, were no match for the wickedness of the Babylonians. Apparently the fate of Babylon’s enemies was common knowledge, and Habakkuk recoils at the thought that the Babylonians would ruthlessly ravage Judah and Jerusalem. The sustained figure of speech, which compares the invaders to an unconscionable angler who fishes for the delight of killing the catch, is as impassioned a plea against inhumanity as the Old Testament contains. Habakkuk did not doubt God’s sovereignty over the enemy nation, but this sharpened the problem. How could a righteous God refrain from intervening?”[3] This time not to deal with sins of his countrymen but to restrain the brutality of the Babylonians.

            In the chapters that follow our Subject Text, God assures Habakkuk that He will honor his promise to raise up and sustain a faithful group from among the people. “God showed Habakkuk that the judgment of Judah, though sweeping, would not be total. He reaffirmed the promise that a remnant would be spared to carry on the redemptive mission and to serve as a foundation for the renewed nation. Habakkuk’s despair over the fate of the righteous evoked God’s promise that they would survive the awful day. The basis of their faithfulness, their total dependence and dependability…Habakkuk used his questions neither to shield himself from moral responsibilities nor to shun God’s claims upon his life. He was genuinely perplexed by the unpredictable nature of God’s dealings. He raised his protests because he hungered and thirsted to see God’s righteousness vindicated. God’s self-revelation laid to rest the ghost of the prophet’s doubts and gave birth to a finer faith. The redeeming God had used the questions as a means of grace to fortify Habakkuk’s faith.”[4] And isn’t faith, or a greater faith, God’s ultimate objective in all His dealings with humanity?

Application

            Does Habakkuk’s confusion and doubt describe your own? The grief of death has found its way to your doorstep too many times over the last few years. You believe you’ve been prepared for a significant relationship that would hopefully lead to marriage but God just won’t arrange for you to meet the right man or woman. You spend your days walking the war-torn streets of your city wondering when the destruction and bloodshed will end. You spend your days staring at the world through iron bars or eyes blurred by sweat and tears because you’ve been deprived of your freedom for the sake of Christ. You spend your days on the move from place to place trying to avoid those who seek to take your life or the lives of your family because of your Christian faith. You poured the best years of your life into your marriage according to God’s instruction on marriage just to watch your husband or wife leave you for someone else. You’ll admit that you’re certainly not without sin but you’ve confessed your sin and done your best to be a faithful follower of Christ yet your life doesn’t seem to make sense—You struggle to do well in school even though you study diligently; you can’t find a job even though you search tirelessly for work; you can’t make ends meet financially even though you work long, hard hours; the doctors still can’t do anything for your sick child even though countless people are have been praying; or your mother or father just won’t deal with their addiction to drugs or alcohol. I can go on but you know your own struggle very well and how you have pleaded with God for answers; for intervention; for relief. You don’t doubt God exists, but as the days, months, and maybe even years grind on, it becomes more and more difficult to see God’s “good” plan at work. You might recall that I mentioned in an earlier lesson that I grew up in the home with an abusive, alcoholic father. I haven’t always been an obedient follower of Christ and there was a time in my life when you could legitimately question whether I was follower at all. However, when I was young, I had no choice but to turn to God because I was trapped in a life I did not choose and could not escape from. I prayed constantly for God to stop the rage that was fueled by the alcohol, but He didn’t. I stopped asking “why?” a long time ago. I have come to realize that God has used all the events of my life to make me the person I am today so I can be equipped to do all the things He has planned for me to do. Some would insist that God could have chosen a less painful path for me and I suppose He could have. I didn’t understand it then and I still don’t understand why God does or allows some things, but I trust more and more each day that His plan is perfect even if I don’t understand it or like it. Trusting God when life is painful can seem impossible. Letting go of our need to control the circumstances of our lives or having answers to the questions that arise in our hearts during those painful days can be especially difficult when God’s Plan Doesn’t Make Sense. A number of years ago when I was going through another very difficult time in my life, a friend gave me something that I would like to share with you. It’s a summary of the lesson from the Book of Habakkuk and what God is trying to tell us through the Old Testament prophet. If God were to speak to you, this is what he might say: “Habakkuk prayed for brokenness in his people and revival through My Spirit. He saw neither. Now hear Me well as I unfold the dialogue I entered into with My frustrated servant. It’s the dialogue I long to have with you. I permitted Habakkuk to continue in the mystery of My silence until he was worn out. Only when false hope is abandoned will My strange but true hope be embraced. I shattered his false hope by revealing My plan for Babylon, a nation more evil than Judah, to rise up and discipline My people. And I made it clear it would all happen under my direction. I want you and all my people to know that nothing catches Me off guard—not Adolf Hitler or Osama bin Laden. Nothing has happened or ever will happen that I am not using for My purposes. But what I allow seems to contradict My holy and pure character. I required Habakkuk, as I require you, to live in the tension between the evil that prospers, whether in the church or in secular society, and My plan to restore the beauty of My character in this world. It is that tension that shifted Habakkuk’s focus away from frustration with what he saw in the world toward the mystery of how I execute My plan. With that shift, Habakkuk was silenced and I spoke. It was then I revealed My plan that everyone must wait to see unfold. People respond in one of only two ways to My requirement to wait. Either they refuse to wait and instead try to manage life according to their desires; or they live by faith in My character, confessing their own selfish ways and yielding to My plan and to My timetable to get them to My party. Know this: those who live by faith will struggle in ways that those who live to make their lives work will never know. It is that struggle, to believe despite desperate pain and confusion that a good plan is unfolding, that will open your eyes to see Me more clearly. Is that what you want? Will you pay the price? The price is this: you will tremble in agony as you live in a sinful, self-prioritizing world as a sinful, self-prioritizing person, knowing that no sin will go unpunished even though, for a time, I will appear to be doing nothing. You will learn to wait in emptiness and frustrated desire for My plan of love to reveal itself. With confidence in Me and hope in My plan, you will not only feel the pain of living in the valley but also see My glory from the mountaintop of faith. Only those who struggle in confusion and wait in hope will be strengthened to struggle well and to wait with confidence.”[5]




[1] Mark J. Boda and J. Gordon McConville, eds., Dictionary of the Old Testament Prophets, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2012), p. 296.
[2] O. Palmer Rebertson, The Books of Nahum, Habakkuk and Zephaniah—The New International Commentary on the Old Testament, (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1990), pp. 141; 149.
[3] William Sanford LaSor, David Allan Hubbard, and Frederic William Bush, Old Testament Survey: The Message, Form, and Background of the Old Testament, (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1996), p. 324.
[4] Ibid., p. 327.
[5] Dr. Larry Crabb, 66 Love Letters: A Conversation With God That Invites You Into His Story, (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2009), pp. 171-172.

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Would A Loving God Send People To Hell?


(Audio Version)

Introduction

            I don’t want to exclude those of you who don’t have kids and my point probably applies in other circumstances as well but it is particularly applicable when it comes to children and especially adolescent children. As a parent, you’ve established specific guidelines of behavior for your child to follow with clear consequences if they fail to follow those guidelines. And when they purposely divert from the prescribed behavior and you implement the clearly communicated consequences, they’re incredulous that you would do something so inhumane as suspend their driving privileges; take away their computer privileges; take away their video game privileges; require a curfew; or some other similar life-altering, earth-shattering, or soul-crushing drama. They knew the rules and they knew the consequences for breaking the rules yet they willing chose to break the rules—now they have the audacity to jump up and down and scream and shout how unfair it is that you are doing what you said you would do and they knew you would do. Some of you may not be able to relate but I know some of you parents are nodding your heads as you remember exactly when this happened to you. But this scenario should actually sound familiar to all of you who know even a little about the Bible. If you turn in your Bibles to the very front, you’ll find a similar story in Genesis. God told Adam and Eve that they weren’t allowed to eat from the tree in the middle of the garden or else they would die. And ever since they did exactly what God told them they were not permitted to do, sin was introduced into the world, and we have blamed God for the consequences resulting from the ravages of sin generally in the world and specifically in our lives.

About a week ago there was a report about a young deaf pastor who abandoned his Christian faith and embraced atheism. Of course the announcement was celebrated wildly by unbelievers as a victory. In an interview, the young pastor explained that through his time as a pastor and diligently studying the Scriptures, he concluded that the miracles of the Bible were simply made-up tales and Jesus was a fabricated, mythical figure. The point of this lesson is not to delve into these two matters because they lack academic merit. We can debate whether or not the miracles of the Bible are true or not but there is no debate as to whether miracles occur today. We may not have experienced any personally but countless miracles are documented to occur around the world in Christian communities every day. So if they occur today, is it really so hard to believe they occurred exactly the way they are recorded in the Bible? Claiming that Jesus is a fabricated, mythical figure is intellectually dishonest. You can deny many things about Jesus but no objective theologian, scholar, or historian denies the fact that the person of Jesus actually existed. This young pastor said something else in his interview that I do want to spend time on because it’s something we hear quite often. He said he couldn’t believe in a loving God who would send people to hell. Maybe you’ve heard this argument; maybe you’ve even believed it yourself at one point. We can make it complicated or we can make it easy but it’s probably somewhere in-between. So this week, let’s take a look at the question: Would A Loving God Send People To Hell?

Subject Text

John 3:16-21
            16For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. 21But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God.”
Context

            Our Subject Text is the end of a discourse that started at the beginning of chapter 3 when a Pharisee named Nicodemus visits Jesus at night. Although Nicodemus isn’t prepared, at this point, to admit that Jesus is divine, he readily admits that based on the miracles performed by Jesus that God is somehow working through Him. Herein we find the famous “born again” text where Jesus explains to Nicodemus that we must go through a re-birth; a regeneration; a spiritual re-birth brought about by the Holy Spirit in the lives of true believers. Of course Nicodemus doesn’t have the slightest idea what Jesus is talking about so Jesus tries to get Nicodemus to set aside his earthly perspective and try to understand what He is saying from a kingdom perspective. Jesus is trying to tell Nicodemus that He is the key that unlocks the door to that spiritual re-birth and all that is required is belief. To help Nicodemus, Jesus uses an illustration that Nicodemus would understand from Israel’s exodus from Egypt. During their wandering in the desert and as a result of their repeated disobedience and complaining, God sent poisonous snakes among the people. But Moses was directed to lift up a bronze snake above the people and those who looked up at the snake believing they would be spared were either not bitten or were healed of their bites. Jesus explains that like the bronze snake in the desert, He would have to be lifted up and that those who look up to him in faith would be granted eternal life. The text doesn’t tell us whether or not Nicodemus left understanding the illustration but the next time we see him he is assisting a group of Jesus’ followers remove Jesus’ body from the cross. He also brought 75 pounds of herbs to prepare Jesus’ body for burial. Perhaps he understood Jesus’ meaning after all. However, after Jesus explains all this, even though you might understand what Jesus was saying, we are left with why was Jesus’ death necessary? And that’s when we get to our Subject Text.

Text Analysis

            If there is a verse in all the Bible that you might say is known by pretty much everyone it’s probably v. 16. I think for good reason though as this one verse is probably the simplest explanation of God’s purpose and Jesus’ mission in relation to God’s created order. Above all things, God is motivated by love for humanity. God is many things: Holy; righteous; just; merciful; gracious; all-powerful; all-knowing, etc. However, above all these God is love (1 Jn 4:8). When you read v. 16, you should be able to establish two certainties: 1) Those who believe in Jesus will receive eternal life, and 2) Those who do not believe in Jesus will perish. Although some people have tried, it’s really hard to interpret this verse any other way. But what’s the other thing that you see when you read this verse? Choice! And like everything in life, our choices have consequences and this choice is no different. However, we tend to focus primarily on the dichotomy contained in the verse between perishing for unbelief and salvation through belief that we miss the most important element of the verse; the driving force behind God’s actions—Love! In the Greek, love is translated as either agape or eros. Agape love is the term used in the New Testament while eros is not found in the New Testament only in Greek philosophy and Hellenistic thought. There is a significant difference between the two. “Agape love…is unmotivated in the sense that it is not contingent on any value or worth in the object of love. It is spontaneous and heedless, for it does not determine beforehand whether love will be effective or appropriate in any particular case. It is a lost love, a love that ‘squanders itself’… Eros is the desire to possess and to enjoy; agape is the willingness to serve without reservations. Eros is an ascending love the proceeds from the earthly to the heavenly. Agape is a descending love the proceeds from the heavenly to the sinful. Eros is attracted to that which has greatest value; agape goes out to the least worthy. Eros discovers value whereas agape creates value. Agape is a gift love whereas eros is a need love…The supreme revelation of agape is God’s self-condescension in Jesus Christ, for there he willingly took upon himself the pain and guilt of the human race for the sake of their salvation. This act of unmerited grace was at the same time the overflowing of his illimiting love, which humans cannot achieve or create but through grace can receive and celebrate.”[1]

            Scripture is clear that there will indeed be a day of judgment when God will hold all humanity accountable for the actions and attitudes during their lives. But that was not the purpose for God’s incarnation in the person of Jesus Christ as vv. 17-18 explains. Jesus was on a mission of salvation not condemnation. At no time during his ministry did Jesus condemn a single person. In fact, in the case of the woman caught in adultery, Jesus specifically tells her that he does not condemn her even as he commands her to leave behind her life of sin (Jn 8:1-11). You might also note that Jesus does not even condemn the demons he exorcises. Although the demons recognize that they will eventually be condemned, they also recognize that the time for that had not yet arrived (Mt 8:28-34). However, v. 18 hints at the purpose for Jesus’ coming when He says that those who don’t believe are already condemned; He came to do something about that. This is where our theology is so very important: Why are we already condemned? Why does anything have to be done about our condemnation? What can be done about the looming condemnation?

Why are we already condemned?

            The short answer is that we are condemned because of sin. At the beginning of Genesis we see that God created all things including humanity. Originally, sin was not a part of creation and as a result there was no destruction, decay or death. All of creation existed in perfect harmony and in perfect relation to the Creator. However, humanity, Adam and Eve specifically, unlike the rest of creation was created in the image of God. In Latin it is known as the Imago Dei. As such, they were created with a special attribute—the ability to choose; a free will. God gave specific parameters for Adam and Eve’s behavior; what they were allowed to do and what they were not allowed to do. In order to maintain the perfect harmony of creation and the unobstructed relationship with the Creator, Adam and Eve simply needed to refrain from pursuing that which God forbade. Nevertheless, God was interested in true relationship with humanity not forced servitude. Consequently, humanity retained the right to choose whether or not they would obey God. Unfortunately, Adam and Eve chose to do the one thing God told them they were not allowed to do. This free will act of disobedience is what is known as the “original sin.” It was through this original sin that all sin was introduced into all of creation and it was this original sin that created the divide between humanity and God. And it is this original sin that has marred humanity’s Imago Dei down through the ages. “The originally created conditions were perfect, and a perfect God can make nothing less than a perfect world. Eventually, however, by a misuse of free will, sin entered the world and vitiated God’s perfect creation. There followed a state of human sinfulness—in which we now find ourselves—that is humanly irreparable. Our imperfection is best understood in light of the ultimate Standard of perfection which is God Himself. The vivid contrast reveals a deplorable picture of human depravity.”[2]

Why does anything have to be done about our condemnation?

            Let me see if I can answer that question with another question. Do you think criminals should be punished? Maybe “criminals” isn’t specific enough for you. Let’s try this: Do you think murderers should be punished? How about rapists? How about child molesters? If you or a family member were victims of one of these crimes, do you think the criminal should be punished? It’s absurd I know but my point is that we would never allow such crimes to go unpunished. Well this same principle applies to God except that every injustice is an injustice first committed against God. You see, we are called to care for creation and love one another and when we fail to do that either through sins of commission or sins of omission, it is true that we sin against some aspect of God’s created order but first and foremost we sin against the Creator. Because God desires to be in relationship with his creation generally and with humanity specifically, God must deal with the injustice created by sin. God must deal with injustice because God is perfectly good and just. Sin is unholiness and unholiness cannot be in relationship with a God who is perfectly holy. “God transcends his creatures, not only metaphysically and epistemologically, but also morally. The Most High is morally spotless in character and action. In essence God is upright, pure and untainted with evil desires, motives, thoughts, words, or acts. God is eternally and unchangeably holy…Free from all evil, God loves only the good and right. He values inner authenticity and takes no pleasure in hypocrisy—religious or nonreligious. God takes no pleasure in evil (Ps. 5:4) and cannot tolerate evil (Hab. 1:13). He cannot even encourage sin in any way (James 1:13-14)…Good is good because it is consistent with God’s very nature. God’s self-determinations always express who he is. He cannot deny himself. God wills the good and holiness because he is good and holy. God is always displeased with evil and unholiness because in his very essence he is awesomely separate from all the evil and unholy. In addition to being morally holy, God is morally just and righteous. God’s character is expressed in his moral law and in judgment according to it without respect to persons. Conformity to a standard implies more than a social obligation; it involves conformity to divine authority expressed in Scripture. Divine judgment is never arbitrary or capricious, but principled and fair. As absolutely honest and just, God declares people to be what they are, sinners. Justice, in matters of merit, judges that morally responsible people should receive exactly what they deserve.”[3]

What can be done about the looming condemnation?

            Having described the cause or our condemnation—sin; and having explained why sin cannot be left unaddressed—God’s holiness. That leaves us with trying to find a solution that deals with our sin while satisfying God’s holiness at the same time. There’s just one problem, how does imperfect and unholy humanity create a perfect and holy solution? It doesn’t! How can finite humanity atone for sins committed against an eternal God? It can’t! So it’s hopeless, right? Wrong! There is someone who can provide the perfect, holy solution—God! And that’s exactly what happened. God Himself became the means to deal with humanity’s sins. In case you haven’t noticed, we’ve come full circle to v. 17 of our Subject Text. God Himself became incarnate in the person of Jesus Christ not to condemn the world but to save the world through Him. Jesus’ death on the cross did for us what we could not do for ourselves—He atoned for humanity’s sins. “Atonement is the revelation of the uprighting justice of God—God’s own surprising and radical way of making things right—through the cross…The cross is a peacemaking event in the divine-human relationship. In the cross, the sin of penitent humanity no longer remains an obstacle in the divine-human relationship…To say that the atonement is a finished work means that in the cross the saving act has decisively occurred (John 19:30). It is a work that is objectively done and complete, a once-for-all accomplished redemption. It does not require some further sacrificial wok on the part of the crucified Lord. The work consists in his obedience unto death, regarded as sacrifice for the sins of others. Reconciliation is not merely an attitudinal change on the part of individuals so as to welcome God back into congenial human company. Rather the cross is the central event of salvation history that has once for all changed the divine-human relationship. In it an unmerited divine gift is actually offered, with the intent of being received…Atonement includes both the reconciling means and actual reconciliation as an end. It is both the means by which the sin/guilt/punishment syndrome is broken and the end result of its being broken. The means by which the sin/death syndrome is broken is Christ’s atoning death and resurrection. The end result and purpose of its having been broken is reconciliation with God…The resulting reconciliation occurs by the distinctive and surprising means chosen by God’s holy love—the cross.”[4]

            Jesus assesses the condition of those who reject God’s offer of salvation in vv. 19-20. Like the young pastor I referenced at the beginning of our lesson, unbelievers invariable try to hide their sinful lives behind three basic arguments and this young pastor used two of the three. The three arguments are: 1) God is a mythical or fictional character humanity has created as a coping mechanism; 2) Unbelievers claim that they could not believe in a God who allows evil; and 3) Unbelievers claim they could not believe in a God who would send people to hell. However, all these arguments are a ruse; a façade to hide the truth. And the truth is that unbelievers aren’t interested in the truth, they are interested in protecting their evil and sinful practices and lifestyles. Pretending there is no God or attributing some sort of deficient or evil character trait to God gives them a false sense of security that they are justified in their unbelief. Nevertheless, Jesus says that unbelievers shun the Light that is the revelation of God in Jesus because their real motivation is to keep their evil lives and deeds in the dark. “Jesus has not come to condemn the world but to reveal and save to provide a way of escape for those shuttered in the darkness…Yet it is not so simple. The affections of people in the world are corrupt; their desires are fallen; they are not eager to be redeemed. They ‘love darkness instead of light’; in fact, they ‘hate’ the light. This is strong language, which uncovers something of the seriousness of the moral struggle between God and the world. Evil and darkness do not ignore the light; they wage war against it, trying to bring it down. But despite these efforts, the darkness cannot vanquish the light. The darkness launches a battle that brings about its own defeat.”[5]

            In comparison to those who love the darkness are those who, according to v. 21, have the courage to embrace the truth of the Light and do what is right. They allow the Light to shine into the darkness that once shrouded their lives. The courageous are not those who defy God’s offer of salvation; they are cowards who think they can hide from God in the dark. The courageous are those who step out of the dark and into the Light and allow the Light to expose and vanquish the darkness in their lives. “Believers live in the light while unbelievers live in darkness…Those who practice the truth, who continuously live in the light of God’s spirit, demonstrate that their righteousness has been brought about by God…Salvation is the work of God internally through the Holy Spirit, but it demonstrates itself outwardly in godly living.”[6]

Application

            Have you ever wondered why unbelievers hate Christians so much? Think about it for a moment—if God doesn’t exist then what does it matter if anyone believes in God? If God doesn’t exist then the ultimate fate of believers and unbelievers is the same—whatever that might be. So what motivates the anger and hate of unbelievers towards believers? Why does it matter to them that believers believe in God? Why should they care if someone else believes in an absolute Good; an absolute Right; an absolute Truth? Is it possible that they are afraid the evil of their lives might be exposed? Are they afraid of getting too close to the light? Consider the attitude and motivational differences between unbelievers and believers respectively—one is marked by lies, selfishness, and hate while the other is marked by truth, service and love; a stark difference don’t you think? Almost as stark as the difference between darkness and light. Let’s look at it a different way. What motivates a believer to reach out to an unbelieving world? It’s easy, believers are obedient to the One who is Lord over their lives and they are motivated by the same thing that motivates their Lord—Love! Remember our Subject Text: “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.” Now, what motivates an unbeliever to confront and oppose believers? Also easy, unbelievers are obedient, whether they are aware of it or not, to the one who is lord over their lives and they are motivated by the same thing that motivates their lord—hate! Remember again our Subject Text refers to unbelievers as lovers of darkness. This is the clue that exposes the identity of the lord that rules the lives of an unbelieving world. Martin Luther called him the prince of darkness; Paul refers to him as one who masquerades as an angel of light (2 Cor 11:14); John refers to him as the one who was “a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies (Jn 8:44).” Unbelievers follow their lord, Satan, with the same fervor and enthusiasm as believers follow their Lord, Jesus Christ. The young pastor I introduced at the beginning said he couldn’t believe in a God that would send people to hell. I think I’ve demonstrated that the young man was being intellectually dishonest while he was hiding in the dark. But let’s not be afraid to ask the question. We should never be afraid of the truth. Would a loving God send people to hell? The short answer is no, God does not send people to hell. However, a loving God allows people the choice between accepting His offer of salvation found in Jesus Christ and spending eternity with Him or rejecting Him and spending eternity separated from Him in hell. As I’ve demonstrated above, we already stand condemned because of our sin. God is not sending us anywhere; God is inviting us to join Him or not. The choice is ours. What will you choose?




[1] Donald G. Bloesch, God The Almighty: Power, Wisdom, Holiness, Love, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1995), pp. 145-146.
[2] Dr. Norman Geisler, Systematic Theology, Vol. 3, (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House, 2004), p. 100.
[3] Gordon R. Lewis & Bruce A. Demarest, Integrative Theology, Vol. 1, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996), pp. 233-234.
[4] Thomas C. Oden, The Word of Life: Systematic Theology, Vol. 2, (New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, 1989), pp. 354-355.
[5] Gary M. Burge, John—The NIV Application Commentary, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 2000), pp. 118-119.
[6] Kenneth O. Gangel, John—Holman New Testament Commentary, (Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, 2000), pp. 56-57.

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

The Great I AM

Introduction

            I had a great conversation with my daughter this week about her faith journey over the last year. She explained that for much of last year, she felt as though God had abandoned her. However, over the last few months what she discovered was that God wanted her to know who He really was and not who she want Him to be. Her experience is really not that unusual for Christians who are truly seeking a deep and personal relationship with the Creator of the universe. However, God wants us to be in a relationship with the God who has created us in His image not a god we create from our own imaginings. Many Christians don’t have these struggles in their relationship with God. These Christians have successfully boxed God up and have Him properly stored on a shelf where they can access Him as needed. But for those who are driven to know God at a deeper level, God in a box on a shelf is not enough. They want to know the God who created all things out of nothing; they want to know the God who parted the Red Sea; they want to know the God who spoke out of a burning bush; they want to know the God who left his throne to become a man; they want to know the God who healed the sick, gave sight to the blind, gave hearing to the deaf, gave voice to the mute; they want to know the God who willingly died on the cross to pay for our sins; they want to know the God who walked out of the tomb after being dead for three days; they want to know the God who is preparing a place for us where we will be able to enjoy him for all eternity.

            It was exciting to hear how my daughter didn’t give up reaching out to God even while He was dismantling her illusion of who she believed Him to be. It might take some time but God promises that if we seek Him we will find Him; if we continue to knock at the door, He will answer. When God did answer my daughter, her reaction was the same as it is for so many who run headlong into God—she was compelled to go to her knees in reverence. It’s what should happen anytime God steps into our lives and reveals something more about Himself to us. This happened regularly during the life and ministry of Jesus. However, many people who encountered God in the person of Jesus revered Him more for what He did for them than for who He was. The people followed Him around because he fed them, healed them, raised the dead and taught them. However, he also tried, often unsuccessfully, to tell the people who He was as a person. On one particular occasion he explained to those present that the Scriptures they studied diligently and believed were the key to eternal life, those same Scriptures testified about Him (Jn 5:39)! Much of the text in my Bible is underlined and this particular text is no different. However, I also have the comment, “Awesome!” right next to it. However, few who heard Jesus’ proclamation about Himself were prepared to accept it; to them it was hardly “awesome.” They had God in a box on a shelf and were perfectly happy to keep Him there. They had created god in their image and Jesus didn’t fit that image. Today, we want Jesus to be God but struggle to reconcile the image of God in the Old Testament as one who commands reverence with His thundering presence and God in the New Testament nailed to a cross. Nevertheless, they are one in the same God who we know and who the Jews knew as The Great I AM.

Subject Text

John 8:48-59
            48The Jews answered him, “Aren’t we right in saying that you are a Samaritan and demon-possessed? 49I am not possessed by a demon,” said Jesus, but I honor my Father and you dishonor me. 50I am not seeking glory for myself; but there is one who seeks it, and he is the judge. 51I tell you the truth, if anyone keeps my word, he will never see death. 52At this the Jews exclaimed, “Now we know that you are demon-possessed! Abraham died and so did the prophets, yet you say that if anyone keeps your word, he will never taste death. 53Are you greater than our father Abraham? He died, and so did the prophets. Who do you think you are?” 54Jesus replied, If I glorify myself, my glory means nothing. My Father, whom you claim as your God, is the one who glorifies me. 55Though you do not know him, I know him. If I said I did not, I would be a liar like you, but I do know him and keep his word. 56Your father Abraham rejoiced at the thought of seeing my day; he saw it and was glad.” 57“You are not yet fifty years old,” the Jews said to him, “and you have seen Abraham!” 58I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered,before Abraham was born, I am!59At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds.
Context

            More than any of the other Gospel writers, John portrays Jesus as a continuation of God from the Old Testament now revealed in the person of Jesus. As a result, John’s portrayal of Jesus has a much more divine perspective. John’s biography of Jesus’ life and ministry seems to highlight the many times the religious leaders opposed Jesus’ revelation of Himself and our Subject Text is no different. Earlier in the chapter, we see Jesus forgiving the woman caught in adultery and ready to be stoned by the religious leaders. Jesus then goes on to proclaim that He is the “Light of the world” and that all those who fail to accept Him will be dead in their sins. Jesus says that those who believe Him will be known as His disciples and will be set free by the truth of who He is. However, the religious leaders refuse to accept what Jesus says and cling to the god they have created in their image. The god they have created has served to elevate them to a status of prominence and respect. That’s the god they want not the God that Jesus is describing. The religious leaders claimed to be purveyors of the real truth but Jesus says that because they fail to believe Him, they are actually perpetuating a lie about God under the influence of the father of lies—the devil! That’s when Jesus rocks their world with a revelation about Himself that demonstrates the continuum of the God of the Old Testament and the God that is now revealed in Him.

Text Analysis

            When the Jews ask Jesus if they are right to say He is a Samaritan and demon-possessed in v. 48, they’re not really asking a question as much as they’re making a statement. They are saying Jesus is unqualified to teach them anything and that He’s crazy for saying the things He was saying. Nevertheless, calling Him a Samaritan seems like a bit of an arbitrary accusation. It’s more obvious to see why they would claim Jesus to be demon-possessed but it’s not immediately obvious why they would say Jesus is a Samaritan. This is particularly puzzling when we remember that at the end of Chapter 7 the Pharisees were debating how Jesus could be the Christ since He came from Galilee. Clearly they knew He wasn’t a Samaritan so what were they saying? “In the language in which they spoke, what is rendered into Greek by ‘Samaritan’ would have been either Cuthi, which, while literally meaning a Samaritan, is almost as often used in the sense of ‘heretic,’ or else Shamroni. The latter word deserves special attention. Literally, it means ‘Samaritan’; but the name Shomron is also sometimes used as the equivalent of Ashmedai, the prince of the demons. According to the Kabbalists [A body of mystical teachings of rabbinical origin, often based on an esoteric interpretation of the Hebrew Scriptures], Shomron was the father of Ashmedai, and hence the same as Sammael or Satan…If therefore the term applied by the Jews to Jesus was Shomroni—and not Cuthi, ‘heretic’—it would literally mean ‘Child of the Devil.’”[1] Certainly, when the religious leaders referred to Jesus as a Samaritan, they may have intended it in the context of heretic, but based on the many times the religious leaders insisted Jesus was doing the work of the devil, it seems just as likely that their intended meaning was that Jesus was a child of the Devil.

            Not surprisingly, Jesus refutes their claim directly in v. 49. But then He goes on the say something very interesting—Jesus says that He honors His Father and they dishonor Him [Jesus]. For Jesus there was no difference—if they honored Him then they would honor the Father and if they dishonored Him they dishonored the Father. “It is Jesus who shows the Father, who reveals God: ‘whoever has seen me has seen the Father’ (Jn 14:9). Some have found the Jewish concept of agency to be a helpful model to explain this relationship…‘The one who is sent is like the one who sent him,’ so to encounter the one sent is, in effect, to encounter the sender. This model also explains the dependence of the Son on the Father, as the former must act out the Sender’s commission exactly and unerringly. Disrespect shown the Son becomes dishonor shown the Father.”[2]

            Jesus was on a mission from the Father and part of that mission was not to bring glory to Himself according to v. 50. However, the Father seeks to be glorified and revered. Everything Jesus did was to bring glory to the Father. The Father will be the judge of those who reject the Son because the Father has sent the Son in order the reveal Himself to the world. This attitude flew in the face of the religious leaders who always seemed to be trying to bring glory to themselves—either through the way they dressed or the way they ate or the way they set themselves above the common, everyday people. They were special and they wanted everyone to know it. They sat in the place of prominence; the head of the table. They were at the top of the guest list for all the important gatherings. The religious leaders became drunk on their self-importance when along comes Jesus, God Himself, who says that He’s not seeking glory for Himself. “Jesus can truly say that he honours the Father only if he can also truly say that he does not seek glory for himself. Unlike others, he pursues only the glory that comes from God. What others think is immaterial; God’s approval is everything, for he is the judge.”[3]

            To this point, Jesus’ words might seem a bit mysterious and obscure, but Jesus’ proclamation in v. 51 is like a swift punch in the gut. Keep His word (i. e. believe and do what he says) and never taste death. At least in this particular exchange with the religious leaders, Jesus has been hinting at his identity; nibbling around the edges; casting a shadow of Himself. Here too Jesus only hints at His identity, for who but God is able grant eternal life? Yet Jesus stops short of explicitly making this proclamation—for now. “John understands eternal life in relation to Christ through faith, love and in keeping the commands of Christ. The word ‘eternal’ here indicates a definite quality: it is a different life from the old existence typified by hate, lack of love, sin, pain and death. Eternal life does not therefore just begin in the future, it is already the possession of those who have entered upon fellowship with Christ. Thus Jn. 3:15 speaks of having eternal life in the present. But there is also a temporal sense, so that eternal indicates the quantity of this life: because it belongs to Christ, who himself is the Life, it has no end. It will not even cease at death.”[4]

            As you can imagine, Jesus’ proclamation sent the religious leaders into a frenzy. They simply couldn’t accept what Jesus was saying. The Jews, especially the religious leaders, were set in their ways and were blind to all else; they were fully invested in the status quo. In vv. 52-53 they confess that their identity is tied to their history and heritage. They believed their greatest asset was their lineage. They were descendants of Abraham and followers of the prophets yet as great as these men of God were, they had all died. They just couldn’t grasp Jesus’ eternal perspective when He said that those who obeyed Him would not die. The religious leaders saw everything in terms of their past establishment as a nation, their current oppression by an invading foreign power and their future re-establishment to national prominence by a conquering Messiah. The Jews defined God in the narrowest of terms and nothing else was acceptable. “[Jesus] had warned the religious leaders that they would die in their sins if they did not believe his message. He had been speaking about the Father’s presence and returning there. But they saw only the earthly interpretation. Abraham died. The prophets died. Yet this strange Galilean promised a life with no death? Obviously, he must consider himself greater than Abraham and the prophets, an unthinkable arrogance which they diagnosed as demon possession. Do not miss the switch in the key question from ‘Who are you?’ in verse 25 to Who do you think you are? in verse 53.”[5]

            Jesus is going to give them an answer but not until He is through making his point in vv. 54-55 when He returns to the theme of glorification. Here He repeats that glorifying Himself would mean nothing, but His Father, who they claim to be their God, is the one that glorifies Him. The religious leaders have demonstrated through their words and actions that they don’t actually know the God they claim as their God. They know the god they have created but they don’t know the Creator. “Jesus’ audience argues in the same manner regarding their natural ancestry…But Jesus argues that lineage from Abraham is evidence not through bloodline but through spiritual disposition…Abraham is the father of those who have faith, not simply those who keep the Jewish traditions and possess his bloodline. Ancestry and tradition offer false promises to those who think that God is found in them alone.”[6]

And if that didn’t infuriate the religious leaders enough, Jesus pours gas on the fire in vv. 56-57 when He says that Abraham was glad when he finally saw the revelation of God in Jesus. With this comment, their minds had to be spinning out of control—Abraham had been dead for more than 2,000 years by this point and Jesus was not yet 50-years old so how was it possible that Abraham was witness to Jesus’ day? True to the end, the religious leaders failed to see the eternal perspective that even Abraham recognized 2,000 years earlier. Their religious world was so small that they couldn’t even imagine that someone as great as Abraham thought differently than they did. “In Jewish terminology ‘the day’ usually signifies the appearance of the Messiah in the last days, but here, as in the Gospel generally, it will denote the ministry of Jesus in its totality as Revealer and Redeemer, through which the saving sovereignty of God comes…Abraham, seeing the day of salvation as the day of Jesus, acknowledged that the Son of God-Redeemer, not himself, was the means of bringing to pass the divine purpose for blessing the nations. He did not begrudge that Jesus was greater than he, but exulted in his work…What a contrast, not to say gulf, between Abraham and these descendants of his!”[7]

            Jesus is done beating around the bush with the religious leaders in v. 58 and the religious leaders are equally as serious in v. 59. Jesus makes an earth-shattering proclamation with just two words. With two small words Jesus connects the past, present and the future in Himself. Jesus identifies Himself as something quite familiar to the Jews—Jesus identifies Himself as “I AM.” There was no confusion in the minds of the religious leaders. Jesus was telling them that he was God! And they were going to stone him for it. In case you’re unfamiliar with the title, let me connect the dots for you. I’ll take you back to Moses and the burning bush of Exodus 3. God summoned Moses to go to Pharaoh in Egypt and secure the release of the Israelite slaves. In his conversation with God, Moses asks him what he should tell the people if they ask who sent him. What should he say if they ask him what God’s name is. God tells Moses that if the people ask, he was to tell them that “I AM” sent him. This would be one of the divine names of God throughout Israel’s history; it was a revered name; it was a holy name, and now Jesus was calling himself I AM! It was blasphemy of the highest order for which the religious leaders immediately armed themselves to stone Jesus. “The contrast between the en [Gk. “was”] applied to Abraham and the ego eimi [Gk. “I AM”] applied to Christ was undoubtedly intentional in John 8:58. The ego eimi here must be seen as linked with the name for Yahweh revealed in Exodus 3 and with the absolute use of ‘I am’ in Isaiah 46:4. It must be noted that when the form of words used in this latter passage occurs elsewhere in the OT (Dt. 32:39; Is. 43:10), it is attributed to God as speaker, followed by words which express his uniqueness. There seems little doubt, therefore, that the statement of 8:58 is intended to convey in an extraordinary way such exclusively divine qualities as changelessness and pre-existence. The divine implication of the words alone account for the extraordinary anger and opposition which the claim immediately aroused.”[8]

Application



            It can be hard letting go of something we have built our lives around. It was hard for the religious leaders as well. Even when the divine Truth was standing before them, they couldn’t believe because they refused to let go of the god they had created for themselves. They knew their god; they were comfortable with their god; they could control their god; they could keep their god in a box; they could put him on a shelf where they could have access to him whenever they wanted and put him back on the shelf when they were done with him. The religious leaders liked their lives the way they were and they weren’t about to have Jesus changing that. But Jesus isn’t that kind of God. Jesus isn’t comfortable; Jesus can be known one minute and unknown the next; Jesus will not be controlled; When they put a dead Jesus in a box, he walked out three days later. Jesus will not be put on a shelf like a canned food product. Jesus is not going to sit by blithely as sin destroys your life while you claim that He is the Lord of your life. God became incarnate in the person of Jesus Christ not to become a hobby that we dabble in on Sunday mornings or some other day of the week. Jesus became a man to become what we could never be—a payment for sins. Jesus became a man to do what we could never do—rise from the dead. Jesus came so that we could have a model for living. Jesus came so that we could know God personally and enter into a relationship with him personally. It is a precarious relationship however when you consider who we’re dealing with. Jesus as a close and personal friend yet one who has the power over life and death is the definition of precarious. Nevertheless, we are left with a choice: Does an intimate relationship with Jesus really matter to us? We cannot have the Friend and reject Sustainer of life; we cannot revere the Sustainer of life and spurn the One who considers us a friend. My daughter chased hard after God last year and in her own way, she was asking God “Who are you?” or “Who do you think you are?” God answered her recently; revealed Himself in some way to her. She responded in the way Jesus knew the religious leaders never would—she went to her knees and worshipped the God of all things who would be her Friend. If you say you are seeking God, what will you do when you find Him? What will your reaction be when you encounter the God who would be your Friend and you realize that he is also The Great I AM?




[1] W. Robertson Nicoll, ed., The Expositor’s Greek Testament, Vol. 1, (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1983), p. 780.
[2] David A. deSilva, An Introduction to the New Testament: Contexts, Methods & Ministry Formation, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2004), p. 419.
[3] D. A. Carson, The Gospel According to John—The Pillar New Testament Commentary, (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1991), p. 355.
[4] Colin Brown, ed., New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Vol. 3, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1986), p. 832.
[5] Kenneth O. Gangel, John—Holman New Testament Commentary, (Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group, 2000), p. 168.
[6] Gary M. Burge, John—The NIV Application Commentary, (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 2000), p. 267.
[7] George R. Beasley-Murray, John—Word Biblical Commentary, (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1999), p. 138.
[8] Donald Guthrie, New Testament Theology, (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1981), p. 332.